newspaper
2:25-cv-07163 Tomas Madrigal v. City of Santa Paula et al
Generic Text Only Entry
Apr 30, 2026
1 min read
civil-litigation
government-litigation
federal-courts
Tomas Madrigal v. City of Santa Paula et al
25-cv-07163
C.D. Cal.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The court entered a generic text-only entry in the case of Tomas Madrigal v. City of Santa Paula et al, indicating that no action was taken on the matter. This entry suggests that the court is waiting for further information or action from the parties involved. The lack of detail in the entry may indicate that the case is still in its early stages or that the court is not yet ready to make a decision.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
2:25-cv-07163 Tomas Madrigal v. City of Santa Paula et al
Other · Apr 30, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
groups
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 30, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes City of Santa Paula, 2:25-cv-07163 Tomas Madrigal.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
chronic
Updated 1 day, 23 hours ago
The Story So Far
Tomas Madrigal v. City of Santa Paula et al is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 25-cv-07163.
The dispute currently identifies 2:25-cv-07163 Tomas Madrigal on one side and City of Santa Paula on the other. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, government litigation, federal courts.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court entered a generic text-only entry in the case of Tomas Madrigal v. City of Santa Paula et al, indicating that no action was taken on the matter. This entry suggests that the court is waiting for further information or action from the parties.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
smart_toy
Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline.
How we verify our work.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
1 event
info
Other
April 30, 2026
2:25-cv-07163 Tomas Madrigal v. City of Santa Paula et al
The court entered a generic text-only entry in the case of Tomas Madrigal v. City of Santa Paula et al, indicating that no action was taken on the matter. This entry suggests that the court is waiting for further information or action from the parties involved. The lack of detail in the entry may indicate that the case is still in its early stages or that the court is not yet ready to make a decision.
Advertisement
newspaper
1 article
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day, 23 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.