President Donald Trump argued at the U.S. Supreme Court that courts have no role in deportation decisions. Trump's administration had been barred by federal judges in New York and Washington, D.C. from stripping hundreds of thousands of immigrants of their legal status.
Latest development
Media Coverage · April 25, 2026
President Trump argued in the Supreme Court that judges have no role in reviewing his administration's decisions on deportation shields. This claim is part of his defense against a court order that blocked his administration from stripping protections from hundreds of thousands of immigrants. Trump's argument challenges the authority of federal judges in New York and Washington, D.C.
newspaper Read articleBy Andrew Chung April 25 (Reuters) – Among President Donald Trump’s main arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court defending his moves to rescind humanitarian protections that shield hundreds of thousands of immigrants from deportation, one stands out: Courts cannot review his administration’s decisions in this area. Federal judges in New York and Washington, D.C., barred Trump’s administration from stripping from more than 350,000 Haitians and 6,000 Syrians a legal status provided by the U.S. governm
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
President Trump argued in the Supreme Court that judges have no role in reviewing his administration's decisions on deportation shields. This claim is part of his defense against a court order that blocked his administration from stripping protections from hundreds of thousands of immigrants. Trump's argument challenges the authority of federal judges in New York and Washington, D.C.
By Andrew Chung April 25 (Reuters) – Among President Donald Trump’s main arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court defending his moves to rescind humanitarian protections that shield hundreds of thousands …
By Andrew Chung April 25 (Reuters) – Among President Donald Trump’s main arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court defending his moves to rescind humanitarian protections that shield hundreds of thousands …
By Andrew Chung April 25 (Reuters) – Among President Donald Trump’s main arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court defending his moves to rescind humanitarian protections that shield hundreds of thousands …
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
49 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.