President Donald Trump argued at the U.S. Supreme Court that courts have no role in deportation decisions. This argument was made in defense of his administration's moves to rescind humanitarian protections for hundreds of thousands of immigrants. Federal judges in New York and Washington, D.C. had previously barred Trump's administration from stripping these protections from certain immigrants.
Latest development
Media Coverage · April 25, 2026
President Trump argued in the Supreme Court that judges have no role in reviewing his administration's decisions on deportation shields. This claim is part of his defense against a court order that blocked his administration from stripping hundreds of thousands of immigrants, including Haitians and Syrians, of their legal status. Trump's argument challenges the authority of federal judges in New York and Washington,
newspaper Read articlePresident Trump argued in the Supreme Court that judges have no role in reviewing his administration's decisions on deportation shields. This claim is part of his defense against a court order that blocked his administration from stripping hundreds of thousands of immigrants, including Haitians and Syrians, of their legal status. Trump's argument challenges the authority of federal judges in New York and Washington, D.C. who previously blocked his administration's actions.
By Andrew Chung April 25 (Reuters) – Among President Donald Trump’s main arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court defending his moves to rescind humanitarian protections that shield hundreds of thousands …
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 week, 1 day ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.