2:25-cv-00220 Waterford Township General Employees Retirement System v. Monolithic Power Systems Inc et al
Order on Motion to Dismiss ( 57
Hrazdan Corporation sued Mercedes-Benz USA in the Central District of California over unspecified claims. The court has issued an order on a motion to dismiss, signaling early dispositive motion practice.
Latest development
Order · May 6, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingCourt
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:25-cv-00220 HERITAGE FOUNDATION et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Other · May 11, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
3 Defendants, 1 Government Agency, 3 Plaintiffs, +1 more
8 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes U.S. Department of Justice, Mercedes-Benz USA LLC, Monolithic Power Systems Inc and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
Hrazdan Corporation Sues Mercedes-Benz USA Over Unspecified Claims is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 25-cv-00220.
The dispute currently identifies 2:25-cv-00220 Hrazdan Corporation and 2:25-cv-00220 Waterford Township General Employees Retirement System on one side and Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Monolithic Power Systems Inc on the other. The case is currently organized around Notice filed, Ongoing case, Multiple plaintiffs.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a order: A Motion was filed. On April 27, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court issued a notice in the case of Hrazdan Corporation et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, indicating that a document has been filed.
This notice is a routine update to the case docket. The filing is likely a non-substantive document, such as a notice of.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest order produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Order on Motion to Dismiss ( 57
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The parties filed a joint status report.
A Motion was filed.
The court issued a notice in the case of Hrazdan Corporation et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, indicating that a document has been filed. This notice is a routine update to the case docket. The filing is likely a non-substantive document, such as a notice of appearance or a request for an extension.
Order on Motion to Dismiss ( 57
Notice (Other) ( 33
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
2 days, 22 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.