hearing

Howard v. Elrac, LLC et al

22-cv-10686
Active Hearing stage Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Howard filed suit against Elrac, LLC and co-defendants under docket 22-cv-10686. The case has been pending since 2022 and a hearing has been noticed, suggesting active case management or a pending motion. Elrac, LLC operates as an Enterprise car rental subsidiary, and cases against it typically involve vehicle accidents, negligent entrustment, or related tort claims. The public record contains only a notice of hearing — no complaint text, motion papers, or prior rulings are summarized here. The case has been active for over three years, which may indicate discovery disputes, settlement negotiations, or a motion for summary judgment approaching resolution.

Latest development

1:22-cv-10686 Howard v. Elrac, LLC et al

Hearing · April 20, 2026

A Notice of Hearing was filed.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • • Liability of vehicle rental company for third-party driver conduct
  • • Negligent entrustment or vicarious liability theory
  • • Damages calculation and insurance coverage
  • • Status of pending hearing and underlying motion
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
groups
Hearing 4 hours ago
A Notice of Hearing was filed.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Notice of Hearing

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
groups
Hearing April 20, 2026

1:22-cv-10686 Howard v. Elrac, LLC et al

A Notice of Hearing was filed.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

2 hours, 1 minute ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.