1:19-cv-07271 Winters v. NYCDOC et al
Pro Se Payment of Fee - Processed
The court processed a payment for a pro se litigant in the case of Winters v. NYCDOC et al. This payment is related to the case number 1:19-cv-07271, which is distinct from the original case of Hillman v. NYC DOC et al. The payment's processing indicates a financial transaction occurred within the case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:19-cv-07271 Winters v. NYCDOC et al
Other · May 05, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
1 source tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 1 distinct source.
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
The court processed a payment for a pro se litigant in the case of Winters v. NYCDOC et al. This payment is related to the case number 1:19-cv-07271, which is distinct from the original case of Hillman v. NYC DOC et al. The payment's processing indicates a financial transaction occurred within the case.
The court processed a payment of fees for the pro se plaintiff in the case of Hillman v. NYC DOC et al. This payment is likely related to the plaintiff's ongoing lawsuit against the New York City Department of Corrections. The payment does not indicate a resolution to the case.
Pro Se Payment of Fee - Processed
Pro Se Payment of Fee - Processed
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 9 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.