1:23-cv-02421 BOWRIN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Reply to opposition to motion ( 44
Hill filed a lawsuit against the District of Columbia et al. The case is currently pending in the unknown court. The lawsuit is related to a notice of change of address filed by the court.
Stage
Motion practice
Timeline
6 events
Coverage
6 articles
Sources
1
Reply to opposition to motion ( 44
Open original open_in_newOrder on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
Open original open_in_newReply to opposition to motion ( 12
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
A Motion was filed.
The District of Columbia filed a motion for reconsideration in the case of Hill v. District of Columbia et al. The motion seeks to revisit a previous decision, but the details of the reconsideration are not specified. This development may impact the ongoing litigation.
The District of Columbia has been granted an extension of time to respond to a motion in the case of TUCK v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (1:24-cv-02609). This means the District of Columbia now has more time to prepare its response. The extension is likely to impact the overall timeline of the case.
A Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis was filed.
A Motion was filed.
A Notice of Change of Address was filed.
Reply to opposition to motion ( 44
Reconsideration ( 62
Extension of Time to ( 19
Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
Reply to opposition to motion ( 12
Notice of Change of Address ( 47
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 6 articles
Timeline events
6 records on file
Last updated
2 days, 6 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.