civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

Hicks v. Warner: Show Cause Order Issued

26-cv-05334 W.D. Wash.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The Western District of Washington issued an Order to Show Cause in Hicks v. Warner, docket number 26-cv-05334. The order requires a party to justify or explain a particular action or failure to act in the case.

Latest development

3:26-cv-05334 Hicks v. Warner

Order · May 8, 2026

The court issued an order.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Order to Show Cause
  • Compliance with court orders
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

W.D. Wash.

Western District of Washington · 9th Circuit · WA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

3:26-cv-05334 Edwards v. Warden of FCI Fort Dix

Other · May 12, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Western District of Washington, a federal district court in WA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes WARDEN FCI FORT DIX and others.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 4 days, 21 hours ago

Hicks v. Warner is an active civil matter in Western District of Washington under docket 26-cv-05334.

Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, federal courts, court watch.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 8, 2026, the docket recorded a order: The court issued an order.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest order produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 4 days ago
The court issued an order.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Order to Show Cause ( 3

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

About This Court

Western District of Washington (W.D. Wash.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, WA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
info
Other May 12, 2026

3:26-cv-05334 Edwards v. Warden of FCI Fort Dix

The court issued a show cause order in the case Edwards v. Warden of FCI Fort Dix, transferring the matter into the district court under docket number 3:26-cv-05334. This means the case is now formally before the district court, requiring the parties to explain why the case should proceed or be dismissed. The transfer signals a shift in jurisdiction and a new phase of litigation.

info
Other May 12, 2026

2:26-cv-05334 Edwards v. Warden of FCI Fort Dix

The court issued a show cause order in the case Hicks v. Warner, requiring a party to explain or justify a particular action or inaction. Meanwhile, the related case Edwards v. Warden of FCI Fort Dix was officially transferred into the district court under docket number 2:26-cv-05334. This transfer centralizes proceedings and may affect case management and scheduling.

gavel
Order May 8, 2026

3:26-cv-05334 Hicks v. Warner

The court issued an order.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

2 days, 12 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.