Henigan v. Blanton et al: Withdraw as Attorney Filed

description

Case Summary

In Henigan v. Blanton et al, counsel filed a notice to withdraw as attorney in the Northern District of Illinois under docket 18-cv-02229. This procedural development signals a change in legal representation for one party, which could influence case progress.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

• • Attorney withdrawal
• • Litigation continuity
• • Client representation

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

N.D. Ill.

Northern District of Illinois · 7th Circuit · IL

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:18-cv-02229 Henigan v. Blanton et al

Other · May 05, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

Parties not parsed yet

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Northern District of Illinois, a federal district court in IL.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.

Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 2 days, 16 hours ago

Henigan v. Blanton et al: Withdraw as Attorney Filed is an active civil matter in Northern District of Illinois under docket 18-cv-02229.

Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, federal courts.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: Attorney withdrawal in Henigan v. Blanton et al (1:18-cv-02229) was filed. This means the attorney is no longer representing the plaintiff.

The withdrawal is likely due to a change in the attorney's schedule or a decision to no longer pursue the case.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.) is a federal district court in the 7th Circuit, IL.

Case Timeline

1 event

info

Other May 5, 2026

1:18-cv-02229 Henigan v. Blanton et al

Attorney withdrawal in Henigan v. Blanton et al (1:18-cv-02229) was filed. This means the attorney is no longer representing the plaintiff. The withdrawal is likely due to a change in the attorney's schedule or a decision to no longer pursue the case.

description View filing open_in_new

newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article

All No paywall (1) Original reporting (1)

newspaper

Coverage

1:18-cv-02229 Henigan v. Blanton et al

Withdraw as Attorney ( 190

May 5, 2026 · 1 min read