civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

Harmon v. Callis et al

25-cv-08500 N.D. Cal.
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

In Harmon v. Callis et al, the Northern District of California issued an order on a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The order addresses the plaintiff's request to waive court fees due to financial hardship.

Latest development

3:25-cv-08500 Harmon v. Callis et al

Order · May 12, 2026

A Motion was filed.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • In forma pauperis motion
  • Fee waiver
  • Financial hardship
  • Access to court
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

N.D. Cal.

Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

3:25-cv-08500 Harmon v. Callis et al

Order · May 12, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

Parties not parsed yet

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 12, 2026.

Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 4 hours, 56 minutes ago

Harmon v. Callis et al, docket number 25-cv-08500 in the Northern District of California, remains active with no judge assigned yet. The case centers on a plaintiff seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis, indicating financial hardship and a request to waive court fees.

The court issued an order on this motion on May 12, 2026, signaling early procedural activity but no substantive rulings. The parties and claims remain unclear from the docket, but the in forma pauperis motion suggests the plaintiff is proceeding without counsel or with limited resources.

The absence of a judge assignment means the case is still in its initial stages and has not yet moved to discovery or dispositive motions. The court’s handling of the in forma pauperis request will determine whether the plaintiff can continue without paying fees, which is critical for the case’s progression.

Until the court assigns a judge and sets a schedule, the case will likely remain in procedural limbo. Observers should watch for the judge assignment and any scheduling orders that will clarify the claims and deadlines.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 6 hours ago
A Motion was filed.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ( 7

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

About This Court

Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order May 12, 2026

3:25-cv-08500 Harmon v. Callis et al

A Motion was filed.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

38 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.