Harmon v. Callis et al
Case Summary
In Harmon v. Callis et al, the Northern District of California issued an order on a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The order addresses the plaintiff's request to waive court fees due to financial hardship.
Latest development
3:25-cv-08500 Harmon v. Callis et al
Order · May 12, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingKey Issues
- • In forma pauperis motion
- • Fee waiver
- • Financial hardship
- • Access to court
Docket Snapshot
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:25-cv-08500 Harmon v. Callis et al
Order · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 12, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Harmon v. Callis et al, docket number 25-cv-08500 in the Northern District of California, remains active with no judge assigned yet. The case centers on a plaintiff seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis, indicating financial hardship and a request to waive court fees.
The court issued an order on this motion on May 12, 2026, signaling early procedural activity but no substantive rulings. The parties and claims remain unclear from the docket, but the in forma pauperis motion suggests the plaintiff is proceeding without counsel or with limited resources.
The absence of a judge assignment means the case is still in its initial stages and has not yet moved to discovery or dispositive motions. The court’s handling of the in forma pauperis request will determine whether the plaintiff can continue without paying fees, which is critical for the case’s progression.
Until the court assigns a judge and sets a schedule, the case will likely remain in procedural limbo. Observers should watch for the judge assignment and any scheduling orders that will clarify the claims and deadlines.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ( 7
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
1 event3:25-cv-08500 Harmon v. Callis et al
A Motion was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
38 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.