1:25-cv-25793 Hare v. Does 1 to 100 + et al
~Util - Terminate Motions ( 22
The court granted a motion to terminate, effectively ending the case. This decision was made in response to a request from the plaintiff, Hare, to dismiss the lawsuit. The termination of the case means that the court will no longer hear arguments or consider evidence.
Latest development
Motion · May 1, 2026
The court granted a motion to terminate, effectively ending the case. This decision was made in response to a request from the plaintiff, Hare, to dismiss the lawsuit. The termination of the case means that the court will no longer hear arguments or consider evidence.
description View filingCourt
S.D. Fla.
Southern District of Florida · 11th Circuit · FL
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Motion practice
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:25-cv-25793 Hare v. Does 1 to 100 + et al
Motion · May 01, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Southern District of Florida, a federal district court in FL.
The newest docket activity we have is a motion dated May 01, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
~Util - Terminate Motions ( 22
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla.) is a federal district court in the 11th Circuit, FL.
The court granted a motion to terminate, effectively ending the case. This decision was made in response to a request from the plaintiff, Hare, to dismiss the lawsuit. The termination of the case means that the court will no longer hear arguments or consider evidence.
~Util - Terminate Motions ( 22
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day, 8 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.