HARDEN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
Case Summary
Civil case in D.N.J. currently marked active. Latest development: 3:20-cv-08386 FULLER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al.
Latest development
3:24-cv-03867 ELMORE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
Hearing · May 12, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingDocket Snapshot
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:20-cv-08386 FULLER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
Other · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 4 Plaintiffs
31 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, 3:24-cv-03674 THOMPSON and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Set/Reset Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings
Open original open_in_newreceipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Set/Reset Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings
Open original open_in_newreceipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Set/Reset Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings
Open original open_in_newreceipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Set/Reset Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
Case Timeline
20 events3:20-cv-08386 FULLER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
A Notice of Appearance was filed.
3:17-cv-13459 BLAND v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
A Notice of Appearance was filed.
3:19-cv-16074 MEINHARDT v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
A Notice of Appearance was filed.
3:24-cv-03867 ELMORE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
A Motion was filed.
3:24-cv-03848 GREEN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
A Motion was filed.
3:24-cv-03834 CRUCE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
A Motion was filed.
3:24-cv-03825 TENDERHOLT v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
A Motion was filed.
3:24-cv-06246 VALDES v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
The court filed a notice in the case Valdes v. Johnson and Johnson, docket number 3:24-cv-06246. The notice does not specify details but signals some procedural update or communication relevant to the parties. This matters because it could affect upcoming deadlines or case management.
3:24-cv-06240 STONE v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
The court filed a notice related to the case Stone v. Johnson and Johnson, docket number 3:24-cv-06240. The notice does not specify the content but signals a procedural update in the litigation. This keeps the parties informed of developments and may affect upcoming deadlines or actions.
3:24-cv-06153 PORTER v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
In the case Porter v. Johnson and Johnson, filed under docket number 3:24-cv-06153, the court issued a notice classified as 'Other.' The notice does not specify the content or action taken, but it formally updates the case record. This procedural step keeps the parties and the court informed of developments in the litigation.
3:24-cv-06151 PARCHMAN v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
The court filed a notice related to the case Parchman v. Johnson and Johnson, docket number 3:24-cv-06151. This procedural update may affect the timeline or actions required by the parties involved. Attorneys should review the notice to understand any new obligations or changes in the case status.
3:24-cv-05983 DUGAZON v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
The court filed a notice in the case Dugazon v. Johnson and Johnson et al, docket number 3:24-cv-05983. The notice likely pertains to procedural or administrative matters. This update keeps the parties and the court informed about developments in the litigation.
3:24-cv-05794 SAFFORD v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
A notice was filed in the case Safford v. Johnson & Johnson et al, docket number 3:24-cv-05794. This procedural step signals an update or communication to the court and parties but does not resolve any substantive issues. Attorneys should monitor this docket for potential impacts on case timing or strategy.
3:24-cv-03916 JACKSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
A notice was filed in the case Jackson v. Johnson & Johnson, docket number 3:24-cv-03916. The notice likely informs the court or parties about a procedural or administrative update. This matters because such notices can affect case scheduling or party obligations.
3:24-cv-03913 WILSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
In the case Wilson v. Johnson & Johnson et al, docket number 3:24-cv-03913, a notice was filed labeled as 'Other' on the court record. The notice does not specify the content or purpose, which leaves its impact unclear without further details. This procedural entry signals some action or update in the case but requires review to determine its effect.
3:24-cv-03912 MANER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
The court docketed a notice labeled 'Other' in the case Maner v. Johnson & Johnson et al, filed under number 3:24-cv-03912. The notice's content is unspecified, but it indicates some procedural or administrative update in the case. This event signals ongoing activity that may affect case management or parties' obligations.
3:24-cv-03885 KISER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
The court received a notice related to the case Kiser v. Johnson & Johnson, docket number 3:24-cv-03885. This notice likely involves procedural or administrative information that could affect case management. Attorneys involved should review the notice to understand any new obligations or deadlines.
3:24-cv-03877 LYON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
The court filed a notice in the case Lyon v. Johnson & Johnson, docket number 3:24-cv-03877. This procedural step updates the record but does not resolve any substantive issues. It signals ongoing activity in the litigation involving Johnson & Johnson.
3:24-cv-03810 TAKETA v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
In the case Taketa v. Johnson & Johnson et al, the attorney representing one of the parties filed a notice to withdraw from the case. This means the attorney will no longer represent their client, which could affect the client's legal strategy and timeline. The withdrawal requires the client to find new counsel or proceed pro se.
3:24-cv-03706 HADDON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
In the case Haddon v. Johnson & Johnson, a notice was filed on docket 3:24-cv-03706. The notice does not specify the nature of the filing but signals some procedural development in the litigation. This update is relevant for tracking the case's progress and any upcoming deadlines or changes.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
29 records on file
Last updated
54 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.