1:26-cv-23130 Calas Batista v. Florida Soft Side South
Application/Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( 1
The court granted the plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the case of Gomez v. Florida Soft Side South. The case is currently pending in an unknown court.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
S.D. Fla.
Southern District of Florida · 11th Circuit · FL
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:26-cv-23130 Calas Batista v. Florida Soft Side South
Other · May 04, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Southern District of Florida, a federal district court in FL.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 04, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Florida Soft Side South, 1:26-cv-23130 Calas Batista and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 1 distinct source.
Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla.) is a federal district court in the 11th Circuit, FL.
A new case, Calas Batista v. Florida Soft Side South, was filed in the Southern District of Florida, seeking a writ of habeas corpus. This is a separate case from Gomez v. Florida Soft Side South. The writ of habeas corpus is a legal action that seeks to challenge the detention or imprisonment of an individual.
The court granted Gomez permission to proceed with the case without paying the required filing fee. This decision allows Gomez to continue with the lawsuit despite financial constraints. The court's ruling is significant because it enables Gomez to pursue their claim against Florida Soft Side South.
Application/Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( 1
Proceed In Forma Pauperis ( 5
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 20 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.