civil-litigation habeas federal-courts

Gomez Castro case against Benzel et al advances with judicial preferences in New Jersey

26-cv-05366 D.N.J.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Gomez Castro brought a case against Benzel and others in the District of New Jersey, docket 26-cv-05366. The latest entry is a notice of judicial preferences, indicating the court's scheduling or procedural preferences. The substantive claims are not detailed.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • • Judicial preferences
  • • District of New Jersey jurisdiction
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D.N.J.

District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

3:26-cv-05366 GOMEZ CASTRO v. BENZEL et al

Other · May 12, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Plaintiff

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes GOMEZ CASTRO and others.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

About This Court

District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other May 12, 2026

3:26-cv-05366 GOMEZ CASTRO v. BENZEL et al

A Notice of Judicial Preferences was filed.

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other May 12, 2026

2:26-cv-05366 GOMEZ CASTRO v. BENZEL et al

The plaintiff in Gomez Castro v. Benzel filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. This legal move challenges the lawfulness of the plaintiff's detention or imprisonment. It signals the plaintiff is seeking immediate judicial review of their custody status.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

39 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.