Gee et al v. Ford Motor Company
Case Summary
Gee and others filed a notice in the case of Gee et al v. Ford Motor Company. The notice was filed and the case is ongoing.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
14 events
Coverage
14 articles
Sources
4
Key Issues
- • Notice filed
- • Case ongoing
- • Unknown court
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
1 - Terminate Hearings ( 180
Open original open_in_newreceipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Stipulation and Proposed Order ( 23
Open original open_in_newreceipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Temporary Restraining Order ( 2
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
14 events3:24-cv-07750 Spaghettata, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company
Status Report ( 32
1:24-cr-00566-2 USA v. Green et al
1 - Terminate Hearings ( 180
5:25-cv-06599 Ramirez v. Ford Motor Company
Stipulation and Proposed Order ( 23
1:24-cr-10035-2 USA v. Lee et al
A Summons was issued.
1:24-cr-00566-1 USA v. Green et al
The US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) charged Green and others with crimes related to the Gee et al v. Ford Motor Company case. This development suggests that the government is taking action against individuals involved in the case. The charges may have implications for the ongoing litigation.
5:25-cv-06782 Hernandez Fernandez v. Ford Motor Company
A notice was filed in the case of Hernandez Fernandez v. Ford Motor Company, which is related to the case of Gee et al v. Ford Motor Company. This notice is a procedural filing and does not appear to be directly related to the main case. The notice was filed on an unspecified date.
5:25-cv-04366 Navarro v. Ford Motor Company
A notice was filed in the case Navarro v. Ford Motor Company, which is related to the case Gee et al v. Ford Motor Company. The notice is a procedural filing that does not directly impact the main case. This filing is likely a precursor to further action in the related case.
5:25-cv-11128 Padilla v. Ford Motor Company
The clerk's notice in Padilla v. Ford Motor Company indicates that a new case has been filed, which is a separate matter from Gee et al v. Ford Motor Company. This notice is a procedural step that alerts the parties and the court to the new case. The filing of a new case can impact the overall litigation scene.
5:23-cv-01489 Jowers v. Ford Motor Company
A notice was filed in the case of Jowers v. Ford Motor Company, which is related to the case of Gee et al v. Ford Motor Company. The notice is a procedural filing and does not provide details on the substance of the case. This filing is likely a routine update in the ongoing litigation.
5:24-cv-00951 Crowell et al v. Ford Motor Company
Ford Motor Company was served with a notice in a separate case, Crowell et al v. Ford Motor Company, case number 5:24-cv-00951. This notice is a procedural step in the litigation process. The notice is likely related to a discovery request or other court order.
5:25-cv-06779 Roquemore v. Ford Motor Company
A notice was filed in the case of Roquemore v. Ford Motor Company, which is related to the case of Gee et al v. Ford Motor Company. The notice is a procedural filing that does not provide details on the case's progress. This filing is likely a routine update on the case's status.
3:25-cv-08465 Scheer v. Ford Motor Company
A notice was filed in the case Scheer v. Ford Motor Company, which is related to the case Gee et al v. Ford Motor Company. The notice is a procedural filing that does not directly impact the main case. This filing is likely a precursor to further action in the related case.
2:26-cv-04234 HERNANDEZ RIVERA v. GREEN et al
The court issued an order.
3:26-cv-01183 Gee et al v. Ford Motor Company
The plaintiffs in Gee et al v. Ford Motor Company have certified that they have discussed alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options with the defendant. This certification is a required step in the ADR process, which aims to resolve the case without going to trial. The certification does not indicate that the parties have agreed to a specific ADR method.
Press Coverage
5:25-cv-06599 Ramirez v. Ford Motor Company
Stipulation and Proposed Order ( 23
1:24-cr-10035-2 USA v. Lee et al
Pretrial Services/Probation - Request/Memo/Summons/Warrant
5:25-cv-06782 Hernandez Fernandez v. Ford Motor Company
Notice (Other) ( 19
5:24-cv-00951 Crowell et al v. Ford Motor Company
Notice (Other) ( 26
2:26-cv-04234 HERNANDEZ RIVERA v. GREEN et al
Temporary Restraining Order ( 2
3:26-cv-01183 Gee et al v. Ford Motor Company
ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options ( 12
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
4 outlets · 14 articles
Timeline events
14 records on file
Last updated
27 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.