legal-news

Garcia et al v. Habib Properties, Inc.

26-cv-04343
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Garcia et al v. Habib Properties, Inc. is a civil case with an unknown court. The case has a docket number of 26-cv-04343. The current summary is an order from the USCA, but the page number is not specified.

Latest development

2:24-cr-00088-1 USA v. Garcia et al

Order · April 27, 2026

The court issued an order.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • • USCA order
  • • unknown court
  • • docket number 26-cv-04343
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

2 events
gavel
Order 5 days ago
The court issued an order.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Order of USCA ( 143

Open original open_in_new
gavel
Order 5 days ago
A Motion was filed.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Order on Motion to Supplement ( 138

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
gavel
Order April 27, 2026

2:24-cr-00088-1 USA v. Garcia et al

The court issued an order.

description View filing open_in_new
gavel
Order April 27, 2026

1:25-cv-05662 Cagwin v. Garcia et al

A Motion was filed.

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other April 27, 2026

2:26-cv-04343 Garcia et al v. Habib Properties, Inc.

The court noticed a deficiency in the attorney case opening for Garcia et al v. Habib Properties, Inc. (2:26-cv-04343). This means the court requires additional information or corrections to proceed with the case. The deficiency must be addressed to avoid further delays.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

3 outlets · 3 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

4 days, 5 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.