District of New Jersey issues scheduling order in Garatziotis v. 1450 Washington at Hudson Tea
Case Summary
The District of New Jersey issued a scheduling order in Garatziotis v. 1450 Washington at Hudson Tea, setting deadlines for discovery and motions. The order aims to streamline case management and prepare the matter for trial or settlement discussions.
Latest development
2:23-cv-20330 GARATZIOTIS et al v. 1450 WASHINGTON AT HUDSON TEA et al
Order · May 12, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Discovery deadlines
- • Motion deadlines
Docket Snapshot
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:23-cv-20330 GARATZIOTIS et al v. 1450 WASHINGTON AT HUDSON TEA et al
Order · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
1 linked entity
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes 1450 WASHINGTON AT HUDSON TEA.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
The case Garatziotis et al v. 1450 Washington at Hudson Tea et al remains active in the District of New Jersey under docket number 23-cv-20330. The court has not yet assigned a judge.
The case involves multiple plaintiffs identified as Garatziotis and others against defendants connected to the 1450 Washington at Hudson Tea property. The precise claims and causes of action have not been publicly disclosed in the docket filings so far.
The most recent docket entry, dated May 12, 2026, reflects a court order related to case management. This order likely sets deadlines or procedures for the parties but does not resolve any substantive issues. The court issued a scheduling order, which typically outlines timelines for discovery, motions, and other pretrial activities.
No dispositive motions or rulings have appeared on the docket yet. The absence of a judge assignment suggests the case is still in the early stages. The parties appear to be preparing for the discovery phase or other preliminary steps.
The court’s management order will guide the pace and scope of the litigation going forward.
The docket provides no indication of settlement discussions or alternative dispute resolution efforts at this point. The case remains open and active, with the court maintaining oversight through scheduling orders. The parties must comply with the deadlines set by the court to avoid delays or sanctions.
Watchers should expect the court to assign a judge soon and for the parties to begin exchanging discovery requests. Motions related to jurisdiction, venue, or preliminary injunctions could follow once the judge is assigned. The scheduling order sets the framework for these next steps and will shape the litigation timeline.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Scheduling Order ( 57
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
Case Timeline
1 event2:23-cv-20330 GARATZIOTIS et al v. 1450 WASHINGTON AT HUDSON TEA et al
The court issued an order.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.