legal-news

Fuller et al v. Pierce Conservation District et al

26-cv-05227
Active Appeal in progress Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Fuller et al v. Pierce Conservation District et al is a civil case with a docket number of 26-cv-05227. An amendment to the judgment has been made in the case. The court is unknown.

Latest development

3:25-cv-05710 Fuller v. Pierce Conservation District et al

Appeal · April 24, 2026

The plaintiffs in Fuller et al v. Pierce Conservation District et al have filed an appeal in forma pauperis, seeking to proceed with their case despite potential financial constraints. This appeal is a request to the court to waive the usual fees associated with filing an appeal. The plaintiffs are likely seeking to continue their case against the defendants.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • amendment to judgment
  • unknown court
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
arrow_upward
Appeal April 24, 2026

3:25-cv-05710 Fuller v. Pierce Conservation District et al

The plaintiffs in Fuller et al v. Pierce Conservation District et al have filed an appeal in forma pauperis, seeking to proceed with their case despite potential financial constraints. This appeal is a request to the court to waive the usual fees associated with filing an appeal. The plaintiffs are likely seeking to continue their case against the defendants.

info
Other April 24, 2026

3:26-cv-05227 Fuller et al v. Pierce Conservation District et al

The court entered judgment.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

10 hours, 42 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.