The FTC reached a settlement to prohibit Kochava and its subsidiary from selling sensitive location data. The companies sold location data tied to millions of mobile devices, violating consumer privacy protections. The FTC's action targets unfair and deceptive business practices in data sales.
Latest development
Media Coverage · May 4, 2026
The parties reported a settlement.
newspaper Read articleCourt
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
FTC to Ban Kochava and Subsidiary from Selling Sensitive Location Data to Settle Charges They Sold Location Data Linked
Media Coverage · May 04, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
3 Government Agencys
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a media coverage dated May 04, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Federal Trade Commission, Consumer Privacy Health Privacy The Federal Trade Commission and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
FTC to Ban Kochava and Subsidiary from Selling Sensitive Location Data to Settle Charges They Sold Location Data Linked to Millions of Mobile Devices is an active civil matter.
Named participants include Commission, Consumer Privacy Health Privacy The Federal Trade Commission, and Federal Trade Commission. The case is currently organized around Settlement posture and dismissal risk, Consumer-finance duties and borrower protections, Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Government parties, public agencies, or official-capacity claims.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 4, 2026, the docket recorded a media coverage: The parties reported a settlement.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest media coverage produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
We enforce federal competition and consumer protection laws that prevent anticompetitive, deceptive, and unfair business practices.
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
The parties reported a settlement.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the …
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
5 hours, 20 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.