3:25-cv-09023 Friery v. Roblox Corp. et al
Notice of Appearance/Substitution/Change/Withdrawal of Attorney
Civil case in N.D. Cal. currently marked active. Latest development: 3:25-cv-09023 Friery v. Roblox Corp. et al. Coverage tracked from 1 media source.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:25-cv-09023 Friery v. Roblox Corp. et al
Other · May 05, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Roblox Corp and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Friery v. Roblox Corp. et al is an active civil matter in Northern District of California under docket 25-cv-09023.
The main identified defendant or respondent is Roblox Corp. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, federal courts, court watch.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Notice of Appearance was filed.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
A Notice of Appearance was filed.
Notice of Appearance/Substitution/Change/Withdrawal of Attorney
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 hour, 55 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.