3:25-cv-10290 Vannorstrand v. Roblox Corporation et al
Notice of Appearance/Substitution/Change/Withdrawal of Attorney
Civil case currently marked active. Latest development: 3:25-cv-10290 Vannorstrand v. Roblox Corporation et al. Coverage tracked from 1 media source.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:25-cv-10290 Vannorstrand v. Roblox Corporation et al
Other · May 05, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Roblox Corporation, 3:25-cv-10290 Vannorstrand.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Vannorstrand v. Roblox Corporation et al is an active civil matter under docket 25-cv-10290.
The dispute currently identifies 3:25-cv-10290 Vannorstrand on one side and Roblox Corporation on the other. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, federal courts, court watch.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Notice of Appearance was filed.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
A Notice of Appearance was filed.
Notice of Appearance/Substitution/Change/Withdrawal of Attorney
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
2 hours, 51 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.