legal-news

Flores et al v. City Of Chicago et al

25-cv-11143 C.D. Cal.
Active Motion practice Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Attorney Kelley-Lomax withdrew from the case 1:20-cv-04595, which is related to Flores et al v. City Of Chicago et al. This withdrawal means that Kelley-Lomax will no longer represent the parties in this case. The withdrawal is likely due to a change in circumstances or a decision to no longer be involved in the case.

Latest development

8:25-cv-01482 DISH Network L.L.C. et al v. Forbes et al

Motion · May 5, 2026

A Motion was filed.

description View filing
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Motion practice

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

8:25-cv-01482 DISH Network L.L.C. et al v. Forbes et al

Motion · May 05, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

4 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 3 Plaintiffs

6 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a motion dated May 05, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes City Of Chicago, 2:25-cv-11143 Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, 1:20-cv-04595 Kelley-Lomax and others.

Press monitoring has found 4 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

update What Changed This Week

2 events
edit_note
Motion 1 day ago
A Motion was filed.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

in Opposition to Motion ( 47 )

Open original open_in_new
gavel
Order 5 days ago
The court issued an order.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Protective Order ( 204

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

4 events
edit_note
Motion May 5, 2026

8:25-cv-01482 DISH Network L.L.C. et al v. Forbes et al

A Motion was filed.

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other May 5, 2026

1:20-cv-04595 Kelley-Lomax v. City Of Chicago et al

Attorney Kelley-Lomax withdrew from the case 1:20-cv-04595, which is related to Flores et al v. City Of Chicago et al. This withdrawal means that Kelley-Lomax will no longer represent the parties in this case. The withdrawal is likely due to a change in circumstances or a decision to no longer be involved in the case.

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other May 5, 2026

2:25-cv-11143 Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 67.150.56.101

The City of Chicago and other defendants in the case of Flores et al v. City Of Chicago et al voluntarily dismissed a separate case, Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 67.150.56.101, citing Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). This dismissal means the case is no longer active and will not proceed. The reason for the dismissal is not specified.

description View filing open_in_new
gavel
Order May 1, 2026

1:25-cv-11143 Flores et al v. City Of Chicago et al

The court issued an order.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

4 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 4 articles

Timeline events

4 records on file

Last updated

20 hours, 25 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.