First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 65 Order, by Pro-Built Development LLC. (Comer, James) (Entered: 07/17/2023)

Pro-Built Development LLC filed its first motion seeking an extension of time to respond to an order related to Rule 65 on July 17, 2023. The motion asks the court to allow more time for Pro-Built to file its response or reply concerning the preliminary injunction or restraining order at issue.

The case remains active, but no judge has been assigned yet, and the court where the case is pending has not been publicly disclosed. The motion signals that Pro-Built anticipates needing additional time to address the legal or factual issues raised by the Rule 65 order.

The absence of a judge or a docket number limits public insight into the broader context or opposing parties involved. The motion itself is the latest procedural step, suggesting the case is still in its early stages or in a holding pattern while the parties sort out briefing schedules.

The court’s decision on this extension will determine the timeline for Pro-Built’s substantive response and may affect the pace of the overall litigation. Watch for the court’s ruling on the extension request and any subsequent filings that clarify the nature of the underlying dispute or the relief sought under Rule 65.