Evidentiary Material of Defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Declaration of Wade Burgess, # 2 Exhibit Deposition of Wade Burgess, # 3 Exhibit ADEM Order)(Comer, James) (Entered: 08/10/2023)
Case Summary
Evidentiary Material of Defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Declaration of Wade Burgess, # 2 Exhibit Deposition of Wade Burgess, # 3 Exhibit ADEM Order)(Comer, James) (Entered: 08/10/2023)
Latest development
Evidentiary Material of Defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Declaration of Wade Burgess, # 2 Exhibit Deposition of Wade Burgess, # 3 Exhibit ADEM Order)(Comer, James) (Entered: 08/10/2023)
Order · May 13, 2026
The court issued an order.
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
Evidentiary Material of Defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Declaration of Wade Burgess, # 2 Exhibit Deposition of
Order · May 13, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 13, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
The case centers on evidentiary submissions from the defendants, including a declaration and deposition of Wade Burgess and an order from the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM). These materials aim to support the defendants' position but the court has not yet assigned a judge or set a schedule.
The filings, entered on August 10, 2023, suggest the defendants are building a factual record around environmental compliance or regulatory issues tied to ADEM's order. The case remains active but lacks public docket details or a clear timeline for next steps. The absence of a judge assignment indicates the matter is still in early procedural stages.
The court's handling of these evidentiary exhibits will shape how the parties proceed, especially if the case involves complex environmental or administrative law questions. The defendants' reliance on Wade Burgess's testimony and the ADEM order signals a focus on regulatory compliance as a key issue.
Watch for the court to set a schedule for motions or discovery once a judge is assigned.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
Evidentiary Material of Defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Declaration of Wade Burgess, # 2 Exhibit Deposition of Wade Burgess, # 3 Exhibit ADEM Order)(Comer, James) (Entered: 08/10/2023)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventEvidentiary Material of Defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Declaration of Wade Burgess, # 2 Exhibit Deposition of Wade Burgess, # 3 Exhibit ADEM Order)(Comer, James) (Entered: 08/10/2023)
The court issued an order.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
41 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.