judicial-watch

DUDOIT v. MCCARTHY

20-cv-00766 D.D.C.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

DUDOIT v. MCCARTHY is a civil case with docket number 20-cv-00766. The current summary indicates that the parties have consented to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge for all purposes. This is a routine agreement that allows the parties to proceed with the case in a more efficient manner.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • consent to proceed
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D.D.C.

District of Columbia · D.C. Circuit · DC

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:20-cv-00766 DUDOIT v. MCCARTHY

Other · Apr 28, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

Parties not parsed yet

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of Columbia, a federal district court in DC.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 28, 2026.

Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

About This Court

District of Columbia (D.D.C.) is a federal district court in the D.C. Circuit, DC.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 28, 2026

1:20-cv-00766 DUDOIT v. MCCARTHY

The parties in DUDOIT v. MCCARTHY have agreed to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge for all purposes. This means that the Magistrate Judge will have the authority to make decisions in the case, including ruling on motions and conducting a trial. The parties' consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge is a common practice that can help to expedite the case.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 day, 5 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.