judicial-watch

Calderon v. The Trustees of Columbia University et al: Proposed Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge Filed

25-cv-08918 S.D.N.Y.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Calderon v. The Trustees of Columbia University et al is a civil case filed in the United States District Court. The case was filed on an unknown date and has a docket number of 25-cv-08918. The plaintiff, Calderon, has proposed a consent to jurisdiction by a US Magistrate Judge. The court has not yet ruled on this proposal.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • consent to jurisdiction
  • US Magistrate Judge
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D.N.Y.

Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:25-cv-08918 Calderon v. The Trustees of Columbia University et al

Other · Apr 28, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff, 1 Related Organization

3 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 28, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Trustees of Columbia University, 1:25-cv-08918 Calderon and others.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

About This Court

Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 27, 2026

1:25-cv-08918 Calderon v. The Trustees of Columbia University et al

The plaintiff in Calderon v. The Trustees of Columbia University et al has proposed a consent to jurisdiction by a US Magistrate Judge, which means they are agreeing to have a lower-court judge handle certain aspects of the case. This is a routine step in federal litigation. The consent allows the Magistrate Judge to make decisions on non-dispositive motions.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 day, 6 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.