civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

Douglas v. Boykin et al

19-cv-00306 E.D. Tex.
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Civil case in E.D. Tex. currently marked active. Latest development: 1:19-cv-00306 Douglas v. Boykin et al.

Latest development

1:19-cv-00306 Douglas v. Boykin et al

Order · May 11, 2026

A Motion was filed.

description View filing
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

E.D. Tex.

Eastern District of Texas · 5th Circuit · TX

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:19-cv-00306 Douglas v. Boykin et al

Order · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

Parties not parsed yet

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Eastern District of Texas, a federal district court in TX.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.

Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 3 hours, 59 minutes ago

Douglas v. Boykin et al is an active civil case in the Eastern District of Texas, docket number 19-cv-00306. The case involves multiple defendants led by Boykin and a plaintiff named Douglas.

The court has not yet assigned a judge to oversee the matter. The case is in its early procedural stages, with the most recent docket entry on May 11, 2026, reflecting an order related to a motion for an extension of time to file.

The nature of the underlying claims remains unspecified in the public docket, but the procedural activity suggests the parties are still establishing deadlines for filings.

The motion for extension indicates one party requested additional time to submit a required document or response. The court granted or addressed this motion in the May 11 order, signaling the court’s willingness to adjust the schedule. This procedural step is common in cases where deadlines are approaching or missed, and it often precedes substantive motions or discovery.

No dispositive motions or trial dates have appeared on the docket. The absence of a judge assignment means the case has not yet advanced to a stage where a magistrate or district judge is actively managing the litigation. This could reflect a backlog in the court or a recent filing of key documents.

The next phase will likely involve the court assigning a judge and setting a scheduling order. This order will establish deadlines for discovery, motions, and other pretrial activities. The parties may also file motions to dismiss or motions for summary judgment once the schedule is in place.

Monitoring docket entries for judge assignment and any substantive motions will provide insight into how the case will proceed. The court’s handling of the extension motion suggests it is open to managing the timeline flexibly, but the case remains at an early procedural point.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 5 hours ago
A Motion was filed.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File ( 43

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

About This Court

Eastern District of Texas (E.D. Tex.) is a federal district court in the 5th Circuit, TX.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order May 11, 2026

1:19-cv-00306 Douglas v. Boykin et al

A Motion was filed.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

4 hours, 53 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.