Douglas v. Boykin et al
Case Summary
Civil case in E.D. Tex. currently marked active. Latest development: 1:19-cv-00306 Douglas v. Boykin et al.
Latest development
1:19-cv-00306 Douglas v. Boykin et al
Order · May 11, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingDocket Snapshot
Court
E.D. Tex.
Eastern District of Texas · 5th Circuit · TX
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:19-cv-00306 Douglas v. Boykin et al
Order · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Eastern District of Texas, a federal district court in TX.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Douglas v. Boykin et al is an active civil case in the Eastern District of Texas, docket number 19-cv-00306. The case involves multiple defendants led by Boykin and a plaintiff named Douglas.
The court has not yet assigned a judge to oversee the matter. The case is in its early procedural stages, with the most recent docket entry on May 11, 2026, reflecting an order related to a motion for an extension of time to file.
The nature of the underlying claims remains unspecified in the public docket, but the procedural activity suggests the parties are still establishing deadlines for filings.
The motion for extension indicates one party requested additional time to submit a required document or response. The court granted or addressed this motion in the May 11 order, signaling the court’s willingness to adjust the schedule. This procedural step is common in cases where deadlines are approaching or missed, and it often precedes substantive motions or discovery.
No dispositive motions or trial dates have appeared on the docket. The absence of a judge assignment means the case has not yet advanced to a stage where a magistrate or district judge is actively managing the litigation. This could reflect a backlog in the court or a recent filing of key documents.
The next phase will likely involve the court assigning a judge and setting a scheduling order. This order will establish deadlines for discovery, motions, and other pretrial activities. The parties may also file motions to dismiss or motions for summary judgment once the schedule is in place.
Monitoring docket entries for judge assignment and any substantive motions will provide insight into how the case will proceed. The court’s handling of the extension motion suggests it is open to managing the timeline flexibly, but the case remains at an early procedural point.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File ( 43
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
Eastern District of Texas (E.D. Tex.) is a federal district court in the 5th Circuit, TX.
Case Timeline
1 event1:19-cv-00306 Douglas v. Boykin et al
A Motion was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
4 hours, 53 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.