Appeal Record Filed in DoubleLine Capital LP v. Odebrecht Finance in SDNY
Case Summary
The appeal record for DoubleLine Capital LP et al v. Odebrecht Finance, Ltd et al was sent electronically to the United States Court of Appeals. This means the case is moving from the trial court to the appellate level for review. The parties now await the appellate court's consideration of the issues raised on appeal.
Latest development
1:17-cv-04576 DoubleLine Capital LP et al v. Odebrecht Finance, Ltd et al
Appeal · May 12, 2026
The appeal record for DoubleLine Capital LP et al v. Odebrecht Finance, Ltd et al was sent electronically to the United States Court of Appeals. This means the case is moving from the trial court to the appellate level for review. The parties now await the appellate court's consideration of the issues raised on appeal.
description View filingDocket Snapshot
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Appellate
Stage
Appeal in progress
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:17-cv-04576 DoubleLine Capital LP et al v. Odebrecht Finance, Ltd et al
Appeal · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a appeal dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Odebrecht Finance, Ltd, 1:17-cv-04576 DoubleLine Capital LP.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
DoubleLine Capital LP and its co-plaintiffs sued Odebrecht Finance, Ltd and related defendants in the Southern District of New York, alleging claims tied to Odebrecht's financial conduct. The case, docket number 17-cv-04576, remains active but has not yet been assigned to a district judge.
The litigation has progressed through the district court phase and is now transitioning to the appellate stage. On May 12, 2026, the appeal record was electronically transmitted to the United States Court of Appeals, signaling that the plaintiffs or defendants have challenged a district court ruling.
The specific issues on appeal have not been publicly detailed, but the move to the appellate court marks a critical procedural shift. The absence of a judge assignment at the district level suggests that the appeal may relate to pretrial rulings or that the case is on hold pending appellate review.
The parties have not disclosed settlement discussions or motions that could affect the timeline. This case involves complex financial allegations against Odebrecht entities, which have faced scrutiny in multiple jurisdictions.
The appellate court will now review the district court's decisions for legal errors, potentially shaping the trajectory of the dispute. Observers should watch for the filing of appellate briefs and any scheduling orders from the appellate court, which will clarify the scope of the appeal and the issues in contention.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Appeal Record Sent to USCA - Electronic File
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
Case Timeline
1 event1:17-cv-04576 DoubleLine Capital LP et al v. Odebrecht Finance, Ltd et al
The appeal record for DoubleLine Capital LP et al v. Odebrecht Finance, Ltd et al was sent electronically to the United States Court of Appeals. This means the case is moving from the trial court to the appellate level for review. The parties now await the appellate court's consideration of the issues raised on appeal.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
57 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.