Doe v. Trump et al sees stipulated order filed in Colorado federal court
Case Summary
Doe v. Trump et al is a case filed in an unknown court. The case was filed under docket number 25-cv-03140. The current status of the case is that it has been stipulated and a proposed order has been filed. The case has a total of 112 filings. The court has not provided any additional information about the case. The parties involved in the case are Doe and Trump. The case is a civil case. The risk assessment for this case is that it is a complex case with multiple filings and parties involved.
Latest development
1:25-cv-03140 Hartsell v. USAA Federal Savings Bank
Order · May 5, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingKey Issues
- • stipulation
- • proposed order
Docket Snapshot
Court
D. Colo.
District of Colorado · 10th Circuit · CO
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:25-cv-03140 Hartsell v. USAA Federal Savings Bank
Order · May 06, 2026
Coverage
7 articles
6 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 5 Plaintiffs
12 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of Colorado, a federal district court in CO.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 06, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes USAA Federal Savings Bank, 5:25-cv-03140 Wilson Domingo Guzman Perez, 1:25-cv-03140 Hartsell and others.
Press monitoring has found 7 related articles from 6 distinct sources.
The Story So Far
Doe v. Trump et al is an active civil matter in District of Colorado under docket 25-cv-03140.
The dispute currently identifies 1:25-cv-03140 Hartsell, 1:25-cv-04415 MONTGOMERY, and 1:25-cv-09730 Strike 3 Holdings, LLC on one side and USAA Federal Savings Bank on the other. The case is currently organized around stipulation, proposed order.
Trump et al is a case filed in an unknown court. The case was filed under docket number 25-cv-03140. The current status of the case is that it has been stipulated and a proposed order has been filed.
The case has a total of 112 filings. The court has not provided any additional information about the case. The parties involved in the case are Doe and Trump.
The case is a civil case. The risk assessment for this case is that it is a complex case with multiple filings and parties involved.
On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a order: The court issued an order. On April 28, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court has granted a motion to consolidate the case of Wilson Domingo Guzman Perez v. Warden et al with Doe v. Trump et al. This means that the two cases will now be heard together, potentially streamlining the litigation process. The consolidation will.
On April 27, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted leave to file a document in the case of Doe v. Trump et al, allowing the parties to proceed with their filing. This decision is significant because it enables the parties to move forward with their case.
The document in question is likely a. On April 24, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Notice of Voluntary Dismissal was filed.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest order produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Minute Order
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
District of Colorado (D. Colo.) is a federal district court in the 10th Circuit, CO.
Case Timeline
7 events1:25-cv-03140 Hartsell v. USAA Federal Savings Bank
The court issued an order.
5:25-cv-03140 Wilson Domingo Guzman Perez v. Warden et al
The court has granted a motion to consolidate the case of Wilson Domingo Guzman Perez v. Warden et al with Doe v. Trump et al. This means that the two cases will now be heard together, potentially streamlining the litigation process. The consolidation will likely impact the timeline and strategy of both cases.
1:25-cv-04415 MONTGOMERY v. TRUMP et al
The court granted leave to file a document in the case of Doe v. Trump et al, allowing the parties to proceed with their filing. This decision is significant because it enables the parties to move forward with their case. The document in question is likely a key piece of evidence or a key filing that will impact the outcome of the case.
1:25-cv-13548 Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
A Notice of Voluntary Dismissal was filed.
3:25-cv-09161 Mohanna et al v. Trump et al
A response was filed.
1:25-cv-09730 Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
The court struck a case from the docket, effectively dismissing it. This action was taken in the case of Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, which was previously linked to the Doe v. Trump et al case. The strike has no direct impact on the main case.
4:25-cv-03140 Doe v. Trump et al
The court issued an order.
Coverage Timeline
Press Coverage
1:25-cv-13548 Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal ( 15
3:25-cv-09161 Mohanna et al v. Trump et al
Reply to Opposition/Response ( 20
4:25-cv-03140 Doe v. Trump et al
Stipulation and Proposed Order ( 112
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
6 outlets · 7 articles
Timeline events
7 records on file
Last updated
6 hours, 4 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.