newspaper
4:25-cv-09778 Wagy v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Brief in Social Security Action ( 18
Apr 20, 2026
legal-news
Dilmore v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
25-cv-04155
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
Dilmore filed suit against the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, docket 25-cv-04155, seeking judicial review of a benefits determination. The 'Remand to Agency' notation indicates the court has ordered the case sent back to the Social Security Administration for further administrative proceedings — a common outcome when a reviewing court finds the agency's decision was procedurally deficient or unsupported by substantial evidence. The court is not identified in the available data. Remand orders in Social Security cases do not necessarily mean the claimant wins on the merits; they require the agency to reconsider under corrected legal standards or with a more complete record.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Judicial review of Social Security Administration benefits denial
- • Grounds for remand to the agency
- • Whether ALJ applied correct legal standards
- • Sufficiency of the administrative record
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
2 events
info
Other
April 20, 2026
4:25-cv-09778 Wagy v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Brief in Social Security Action ( 18
info
Other
April 20, 2026
1:25-cv-04155 Dilmore v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
The case was remanded to a lower court.
Advertisement
newspaper
2 articles
Press Coverage
newspaper
1:25-cv-04155 Dilmore v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Remand to Agency ( 12
Apr 20, 2026
1 min read
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
2 hours, 3 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.