newspaper
pacer
4:26-cv-40006 Juka v. Commissioner of Social Security
Brief - not related to a motion ( 7
Apr 15, 2026
legal-news
Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security
25-cv-07432
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security involves a dispute over the denial of Social Security benefits. The case centers on the administrative record compiled by the Social Security Administration, which is under review to determine if the denial was supported by substantial evidence. The court will assess whether the claimant met the criteria for benefits and if the Commissioner followed proper procedures. This case highlights issues related to disability determination and administrative law.
Stage
Motion practice
Timeline
22 events
Coverage
22 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Social Security benefits denial
- • Administrative record review
- • Disability determination
- • Procedural compliance
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
update What Changed This Week
3 events
edit_note
Motion
3 days ago
In the case Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security, a brief was filed that is not connected to any motion. This means the document was submitted to provide information or arguments but does not request the court to take any specific acti
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Brief - not related to a motion ( 7
Open original open_in_new
gavel
Order
3 days ago
In the case of Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security, the court issued an order dismissing the case. This means the court has decided to end the case without further proceedings. Such an order typically indicates that the claims were re
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Order of Dismissal ( 17
Open original open_in_new
gavel
Order
3 days ago
The court issued a scheduling order in the case Bailey v. Commissioner of Social Security, setting deadlines for key steps in the litigation process. This helps organize the case timeline and ensures that both parties know when to submit do
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Scheduling Order ( 11
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
article
Analysis & Coverage
Case Analysis
Apr 16, 2026
Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security: Disability Benefits Dispute
Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security examines a Social Security benefits denial, focusing on administrative record review and procedural compliance.
Case Analysis
Apr 16, 2026
Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security: Disability Benefits Dispute
Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security examines the denial of disability benefits, focusing on the administrative record and procedural compliance.
Case Analysis
Apr 16, 2026
Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security: Disability Benefits Dispute
Federal court case examining denial of Social Security benefits, focusing on administrative record review and disability determination.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
20 events
edit_note
Motion
April 15, 2026
4:26-cv-40006 Juka v. Commissioner of Social Security
In the case Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security, a brief was filed that is not connected to any motion. This means the document was submitted to provide information or arguments but does not request the court to take any specific action at this time.
gavel
Order
April 15, 2026
2:25-cv-00740 GJERGJI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
In the case of Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security, the court issued an order dismissing the case. This means the court has decided to end the case without further proceedings. Such an order typically indicates that the claims were resolved or deemed insufficient to continue.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
2:24-cv-00679 Nickson v. Commissioner of Social Security
In the case Nickson v. Commissioner of Social Security, a declaration was filed, which is a formal statement submitted to the court. This document likely contains important information or evidence relevant to the case. Such filings help the court understand the facts and make informed decisions.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
2:25-cv-14446 Griebe v. Commissioner of Social Security
In the case of Griebe v. Commissioner of Social Security, the court granted an extension of time, allowing one party additional time to complete a required action or submit documents. This extension helps ensure that both parties have adequate opportunity to prepare their case properly. It matters because it can affect the timeline and progress of the legal proceedings.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:25-cv-07670 Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security
In the case of Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security, the court granted an extension of time for one party to file their response or reply. This means the party has more time to submit their arguments or evidence, which can affect the timeline of the case. Extensions like this help ensure that all parties have a fair chance to present their case.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
2:25-cv-02389 Noy v. Commissioner of Social Security
In the case Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security, the court issued a judgment related to the case Noy v. Commissioner of Social Security. This indicates that the court has made a final decision or ruling on a matter involving these Social Security claims. Such judgments resolve disputes over benefits and set precedents for how similar cases may be handled.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
2:25-cv-13521 MERCADO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
In the case of Mercado v. Commissioner of Social Security, the defendants submitted their response brief. This document presents the defendants' arguments and positions regarding the issues raised by the plaintiff. It is a key step in the legal process as it helps the court understand both sides before making a decision.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
2:26-cv-03988 Lynch v. Commissioner of Social Security
A new case titled Lynch v. Commissioner of Social Security was filed, separate from the ongoing Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security case. This indicates another individual is challenging a decision made by the Social Security Administration. It matters because it reflects ongoing legal disputes over Social Security benefits.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:25-cv-09431 Carrasco v. Commissioner of Social Security
In the case Carrasco v. Commissioner of Social Security, the court received a filing that exceeded the allowed page limit by 13 pages. This means the submitted document was longer than the court's rules permit, which could affect how the court reviews the material. Managing page limits ensures fairness and efficiency in legal proceedings.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
2:26-cv-03745 BROWN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
A new case titled Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security was filed, separate from the ongoing Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security case. This indicates another individual is challenging a decision made by the Social Security Administration. It matters because it reflects continued legal disputes over Social Security benefits.
gavel
Order
April 15, 2026
1:26-cv-00817 Bailey v. Commissioner of Social Security
The court issued a scheduling order in the case Bailey v. Commissioner of Social Security, setting deadlines for key steps in the litigation process. This helps organize the case timeline and ensures that both parties know when to submit documents and prepare for hearings. It matters because it keeps the case moving efficiently toward resolution.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
3:25-cv-05691 Kulbatskiy v. Commissioner of Social Security
A new case titled Kulbatskiy v. Commissioner of Social Security was filed, separate from the ongoing Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security case. This indicates another individual is challenging a decision made by the Social Security Administration. It matters because it shows multiple claims are being brought against the agency, potentially highlighting broader issues with its decisions.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:26-cv-01367 Pickering-George v. Commissioner of Social Security
A new case titled Pickering-George v. Commissioner of Social Security was filed, separate from the ongoing Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security case. This indicates another individual is challenging a decision by the Social Security Administration. It matters because it shows multiple disputes over Social Security decisions are being brought to court.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
2:25-cv-02040 Kaiser v. Commissioner of Social Security
In the case of Kaiser v. Commissioner of Social Security, a responsive brief was filed. This means one party submitted their formal reply to arguments made by the opposing side, which helps clarify their position in the dispute. Such filings are crucial as they guide the court's understanding and decision-making process.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:25-cv-07991 Cappabianca v. Commissioner of Social Security
In the case Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security, a Notice of Appearance was filed for a related case, Cappabianca v. Commissioner of Social Security. This means that an attorney officially entered their representation in the Cappabianca case, signaling active legal participation. It matters because it ensures proper legal representation and communication in the proceedings.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
3:26-cv-30038 Winspeare v. Commissioner of Social Security
In the case of Winspeare v. Commissioner of Social Security, the Social Security Administration (SSA) submitted the administrative record, which includes all documents and evidence considered during the SSA's decision-making process. This record is essential for the court to review the basis of the SSA's ruling. It matters because the court relies on this information to determine if the SSA's decision was lawful and supported by evidence.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:20-cv-08523 Baker v. Commissioner of Social Security
In the case Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security, a related event from the Baker v. Commissioner of Social Security case was referenced or noted. This indicates that the court is considering or acknowledging a previous case that may have relevant legal points or precedents. Such cross-referencing helps ensure consistency in legal decisions involving Social Security disputes.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:25-cv-11054 Ramunno v. Commissioner of Social Security
In the case of Ramunno v. Commissioner of Social Security, there was an event related to attorney fees. This likely involves a decision or discussion about the payment of legal fees to the attorney representing one of the parties. Understanding attorney fees is important because it affects the costs and fairness of legal representation in Social Security disputes.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
4:26-cv-40074 Justiniano Maytin v. Commissioner of Social Security
In the case Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security, an administrative record from a related case, Justiniano Maytin v. Commissioner of Social Security, was filed. This document contains important evidence and information reviewed by the Social Security Administration, which is crucial for the court's evaluation. Such filings help ensure that the court has all relevant details to make a fair decision.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
7:25-cv-10608 Peguero v. Commissioner of Social Security
In the case of Peguero v. Commissioner of Social Security, the Social Security Administration submitted the administrative record, which includes all documents and evidence considered during the agency's decision. This is a crucial step as it provides the court with the necessary information to review the case properly. The event is related to another case, Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security, indicating ongoing related proceedings.
Loading more events...
Advertisement
newspaper
22 articles
Press Coverage
newspaper
newspaper
newspaper
newspaper
pacer
1:25-cv-07670 Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ( 19
Apr 15, 2026
newspaper
newspaper
pacer
2:25-cv-13521 MERCADO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Defendants Response Brief ( 9
Apr 15, 2026
newspaper
newspaper
newspaper
newspaper
newspaper
newspaper
newspaper
newspaper
pacer
1:25-cv-07991 Cappabianca v. Commissioner of Social Security
Notice of Appearance ( 14
Apr 15, 2026
newspaper
pacer
3:26-cv-30038 Winspeare v. Commissioner of Social Security
SSA Administrative Record ( 8
Apr 15, 2026
newspaper
newspaper
newspaper
pacer
4:26-cv-40074 Justiniano Maytin v. Commissioner of Social Security
SSA Administrative Record ( 9
Apr 15, 2026
newspaper
pacer
7:25-cv-10608 Peguero v. Commissioner of Social Security
SSA Administrative Record ( 11
Apr 15, 2026
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 22 articles
Timeline events
22 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 17 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.