Docket Entry Number 18 Deleted for Incorrect Event, Corrected by Filing Number 20
Case Summary
A docket entry numbered 18 was deleted due to being an incorrect event and was corrected by filing number 20. This administrative correction ensures the docket accurately reflects case events.
Latest development
DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER 18 Reason: Incorrect event. Corrected Filing Document Number 20 . (alma, ) (Entered: 05/05/2026)
Filing · May 11, 2026
The court deleted docket entry number 18 because it was filed in error. The correct document was filed as number 20. This correction ensures the case record accurately reflects the proper filings.
Key Issues
- • Docket correction
- • Administrative update
- • Case record accuracy
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Initial filing stage
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER 18 Reason: Incorrect event. Corrected Filing Document Number 20 . (alma, ) (Entered:
Filing · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a filing dated May 12, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
The court deleted docket entry number 18 on May 12, 2026, after determining it was filed in error. The correct filing was submitted as docket entry number 20. This action aims to maintain an accurate and reliable case record.
The case remains active, but no judge has been assigned yet, and the court and filing dates are not publicly available. The deletion and correction suggest ongoing administrative adjustments rather than substantive rulings or motions. Without more details on the parties or claims, the case's subject matter and stakes remain unclear.
Watch for the assignment of a judge or substantive filings to clarify the dispute and the court's direction.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER 18 Reason: Incorrect event. Corrected Filing Document Number 20 . (alma, ) (Entered: 05/05/2026)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventDELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER 18 Reason: Incorrect event. Corrected Filing Document Number 20 . (alma, ) (Entered: 05/05/2026)
The court deleted docket entry number 18 because it was filed in error. The correct document was filed as number 20. This correction ensures the case record accurately reflects the proper filings.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
13 hours, 58 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.