legal-news

David Glenn Liepe v. Frank Bisignano

25-cv-08294
Active Appeal in progress Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

David Glenn Liepe v. Frank Bisignano is a civil case. The court has awarded EAJA fees to one of the parties in the case. The award was issued on docket number 25-cv-08294. The case is now closed, and no further information is available.

Latest development

5:25-cv-02695 Maria Dominguez v. Frank Bisignano

Appeal · April 21, 2026

A Motion was filed.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • EAJA fees
  • court award
  • case closure
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

2 events
arrow_upward
Appeal 3 days ago
A Motion was filed.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Brief (non-motion non-appeal) ( 17

Open original open_in_new
arrow_upward
Appeal 3 days ago
A Motion was filed.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Brief (non-motion non-appeal) ( 14

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
arrow_upward
Appeal April 21, 2026

5:25-cv-02695 Maria Dominguez v. Frank Bisignano

A Motion was filed.

arrow_upward
Appeal April 21, 2026

2:25-cv-11966 Geraldine Henrietta Pacheco v. Frank Bisignano

A Motion was filed.

info
Other April 21, 2026

2:25-cv-08294 David Glenn Liepe v. Frank Bisignano

The court awarded David Glenn Liepe EAJA fees, which means he will receive reimbursement for his legal expenses. This award is a result of Liepe's successful lawsuit against Frank Bisignano. The award of EAJA fees is significant because it helps to offset the financial burden of litigating a case.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 3 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

3 days, 4 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.