Judge Brinkema signs consent order of forfeiture involving Erlinda Ramos-Bobadilla
Case Summary
District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema signed a consent order of forfeiture involving Erlinda Ramos-Bobadilla on March 28, 2023. The order reflects agreement on forfeiture terms without contest.
Latest development
Consent ORDER of Forfeiture as to Erlinda Ramos-Bobadilla.. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 3/28/23. (yguy) (Entered: 03/28/2023)
Order · May 10, 2026
Judge Leonie issued an order.
Key Issues
- • Consent order
- • Forfeiture
- • Erlinda Ramos-Bobadilla
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
Consent ORDER of Forfeiture as to Erlinda Ramos-Bobadilla.. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 3/28/23.
Order · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge
1 linked entity
Judge
Leonie M. Brinkema
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Leonie M. Brinkema.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
The court entered a Consent Order of Forfeiture against Erlinda Ramos-Bobadilla on March 28, 2023. District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema signed the order, formalizing the forfeiture agreement.
The order resolves the forfeiture claims tied to Ramos-Bobadilla, though the underlying facts and claims remain undisclosed in the public docket. The case remains active, but the forfeiture marks a significant procedural milestone. The court has not released additional filings or rulings clarifying the scope or assets involved in the forfeiture.
Judge Brinkema’s involvement signals this matter is before a federal district court, but the specific district is not identified in the available records. The case’s next steps likely involve addressing any remaining claims or enforcement actions related to the forfeiture.
The docket lacks detailed filings, so the forfeiture order stands as the most recent substantive development. This order may conclude the government’s claims against Ramos-Bobadilla or set the stage for related proceedings involving other parties or assets. The absence of public filings limits insight into the broader litigation context or potential appeals.
The case remains open, but the forfeiture order narrows the dispute to the terms agreed upon by the parties and approved by the court.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
Consent ORDER of Forfeiture as to Erlinda Ramos-Bobadilla.. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 3/28/23. (yguy) (Entered: 03/28/2023)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventConsent ORDER of Forfeiture as to Erlinda Ramos-Bobadilla.. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 3/28/23. (yguy) (Entered: 03/28/2023)
Judge Leonie issued an order.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
8 hours, 53 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.