Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 24 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Oscar DeLeon, Isabel Deleon, Casey Dickson. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kelly, Kristi) (Entered: 02/11/2026)
Case Summary
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 24 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Oscar DeLeon, Isabel Deleon, Casey Dickson. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kelly, Kristi) (Entered: 02/11/2026)
Latest development
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 15 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Isabel Deleon. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kelly, Kristi) (Entered: 12/17/2025)
Order · May 10, 2026
Isabel Deleon filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction.
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 15 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Isabel
Order · May 10, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 10, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
The parties Oscar DeLeon, Isabel DeLeon, and Casey Dickson jointly moved for an extension of time to respond to motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The motions to dismiss, filed by Oscar and Isabel DeLeon on May 10, 2026, challenge the court's authority to hear the case.
The extension request, filed on February 11, 2026, seeks additional time to prepare replies to these jurisdictional challenges. No judge has been assigned to the case yet, and the court has not ruled on the extension motion. The underlying dispute that prompted the jurisdictional motions remains unclear from the docket.
The extension motion includes a proposed order, indicating the parties expect the court to grant more time. The case is active but at an early procedural stage, focused on whether the court has proper jurisdiction. The outcome of the jurisdictional motions will determine if the case proceeds or ends before reaching the merits.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 15 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Isabel Deleon. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kelly, Kristi) (Entered: 12/17/2025)
receipt_long Source expand_more
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 24 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Oscar DeLeon, Isabel Deleon, Casey Dickson. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kelly, Kristi) (Entered: 02/11/2026)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
2 eventsMOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 15 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Isabel Deleon. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kelly, Kristi) (Entered: 12/17/2025)
Isabel Deleon filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction.
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 24 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Oscar DeLeon, Isabel Deleon, Casey Dickson. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kelly, Kristi) (Entered: 02/11/2026)
Oscar DeLeon filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
8 hours, 48 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.