COLEMAN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
Case Summary
Coleman sued the District of Columbia and other defendants in a civil rights action. The case docket shows a recent notice of withdrawal of appearance by counsel, indicating a change in legal representation.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Civil rights
- • Representation change
- • District of Columbia
- • Procedural posture
Docket Snapshot
Court
D.D.C.
District of Columbia · D.C. Circuit · DC
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:21-cv-02674 AMAALA JONES-BEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Other · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of Columbia, a federal district court in DC.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes District of Columbia, AMAALA JONES-BEY.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
District of Columbia (D.D.C.) is a federal district court in the D.C. Circuit, DC.
Case Timeline
2 events1:21-cv-02674 AMAALA JONES-BEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
A Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance was filed.
1:24-cv-03598 COLEMAN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
The court issued a Report and Recommendation in the case Coleman v. District of Columbia et al, docket number 1:24-cv-03598. This document likely contains the magistrate judge's analysis and proposed rulings on pending motions or procedural matters. Parties will have an opportunity to respond before the district judge makes a final decision.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
6 hours, 52 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.