Cluster 15: 1:22-cv-01635 Mansoori v. Doe et al, 1:21-cv-06242 Mansoori v. Smith et al, 1:21-cv-05881 Mansoori v. Squires et al

Filed

In the case of Mansoori v. Doe et al, docket number 22-cv-01635, the court addressed a motion for an extension of time. The order pertains to procedural scheduling, allowing one or more parties additional time to meet a deadline set by the court. Specific details about the underlying dispute or claims between Mansoori and Doe are not provided in the available information. The ruling focuses solely on the administrative aspect of case management rather than substantive legal issues.

View Case arrow_forward

Filed

In the case of Mansoori v. Smith et al, docket number 21-cv-06242, the court issued an order addressing a motion for an extension of time. The motion sought additional time for one or more parties to meet a procedural deadline within the litigation. The order reflects the court's consideration of the request and its decision to grant or deny the extension, impacting the timeline of the case proceedings. Specific details regarding the reasons for the extension or the parties involved are not provided in the available information.

View Case arrow_forward

Filed

In the case of Mansoori v. Squires et al, docket number 21-cv-05881, the court issued an order regarding a motion for an extension of time. The motion sought additional time for a party to comply with a procedural requirement or deadline in the litigation. The court's order addresses whether the extension was granted or denied, impacting the timeline and management of the case. Specific details about the underlying claims or parties' arguments are not provided in the available information. As this is a procedural order, it primarily affects the scheduling and procedural posture of the case rather than substantive legal issues.

View Case arrow_forward