Cluster 6: 2:25-cv-03806 Jacqueline Garcia v. Marathon Petroleum Logistics Services, LLC et al, 2:26-cv-00027 BAL Management, LLC v. Igor Krivoruchko et al, 2:26-cv-03750 Mendoza v. Chang

Filed

In the case of Robert Cauley v. Universal Reproductions, Inc. et al, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). This procedural rule permits a plaintiff to dismiss a case without a court order before the defendant files an answer or a motion for summary judgment. As a result, the litigation was terminated without any adjudication on the merits of the underlying claims. No additional information about the nature of the dispute or the reasons behind the dismissal is available.

Filed

In the case of Tamara Bodnar v. SecureSpace Management LLC et al, docket number 26-cv-03186, the plaintiff chose to voluntarily dismiss the lawsuit. This dismissal was made under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), which permits a plaintiff to end the case without a court order, provided the defendant has not yet filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment. As a result, the case was terminated without any judgment on the merits or resolution of the underlying claims. No additional information about the nature of the dispute or the parties' allegations is available.

Filed

In the case of Jacqueline Garcia v. Marathon Petroleum Logistics Services, LLC et al, docket number 25-cv-03806, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). This rule allows a plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order before the opposing party serves an answer or a motion for summary judgment. The dismissal effectively ends the case without a judgment on the merits, allowing the plaintiff to potentially refile the claim in the future if desired. No further details about the underlying claims or reasons for dismissal are provided in the record.

Filed

In the case BAL Management, LLC v. Igor Krivoruchko et al, docket number 26-cv-00027, the plaintiff chose to voluntarily dismiss the lawsuit under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). This procedural rule permits a plaintiff to dismiss their case without a court order, provided the opposing party has not yet filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment. As a result, the dismissal concluded the case without proceeding to trial or a decision on the substantive issues involved. No additional information is available regarding the nature of the dispute or the reasons behind the plaintiff's decision to dismiss.

Filed

In the case of Mendoza v. Chang, docket number 26-cv-03750, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). This rule allows a plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves an answer or a motion for summary judgment. The dismissal effectively ends the case without prejudice, allowing the plaintiff the option to refile in the future if desired. No substantive ruling on the merits of the case was made, as the dismissal was initiated by the plaintiff.

Filed

In the case of Kenneth Davidson v. Alex Cheung et al, docket number 25-cv-11445, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). This rule allows a plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves an answer or a motion for summary judgment. The dismissal effectively ends the case without prejudice, allowing the plaintiff the option to refile the suit in the future if desired. No substantive rulings or judgments on the merits were made in this matter.

Filed

In the case of Angel Garcia v. Chingon Catering LLC et al, docket number 2:26-cv-00115, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). This procedural rule allows a plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order before the opposing party serves an answer or a motion for summary judgment. The dismissal effectively ends the case without prejudice, meaning the plaintiff may refile the claim in the future if desired. Specific details regarding the underlying dispute or claims were not provided in the dismissal notice.

Filed

In the case titled Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Ralph D. Garcia et al, docket number 26-cv-02218, the plaintiff, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit against the defendants. The dismissal was filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), which allows a plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order before the opposing party serves an answer or motion for summary judgment. The case details and underlying claims are not provided, but the voluntary dismissal indicates that the plaintiff chose to terminate the litigation at this stage.