Clerk dismisses plaintiff's complaint without prejudice for failure to timely substitute party
Case Summary
The clerk dismissed the plaintiff's complaint without prejudice for failing to timely file a motion to substitute a party under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1). The dismissal allows the plaintiff to refile if procedural requirements are met.
Latest development
CLERK'S JUDGMENT that Plaintiff's Complaint Doc. 1-1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to file a timely motion to substitute in accordance with Rule 25(a)(l) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Appeal · May 11, 2026
A Motion was filed.
Key Issues
- • Failure to substitute party
- • Rule 25(a)(1) compliance
- • Complaint dismissal without prejudice
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Appeal in progress
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
CLERK'S JUDGMENT that Plaintiff's Complaint Doc. 1-1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to file a timely motion
Appeal · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a appeal dated May 11, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
The court dismissed the plaintiff's complaint without prejudice on February 21, 2024. The dismissal followed the plaintiff's failure to file a timely motion to substitute a party under Rule 25(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This procedural rule requires a party to move for substitution within 90 days after a party's death or similar event.
The court's order did not assign a judge or specify the court handling the case. The dismissal leaves the plaintiff the option to refile the complaint if they comply with procedural requirements. The clerk’s judgment also referenced an appeals jurisdiction checklist, signaling that any appeal must meet specific jurisdictional standards.
The case remains active but stalled pending further filings. The docket does not provide details on the underlying claims or parties involved. The next significant development will likely hinge on whether the plaintiff files a renewed motion to substitute or refiles the complaint properly.
The case’s procedural posture highlights the importance of strict compliance with Rule 25 deadlines in federal litigation.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
CLERK'S JUDGMENT that Plaintiff's Complaint Doc. 1-1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to file a timely motion to substitute in accordance with Rule 25(a)(l) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (dgr)--Please refer to to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- (Entered: 02/21/2024)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventCLERK'S JUDGMENT that Plaintiff's Complaint Doc. 1-1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to file a timely motion to substitute in accordance with Rule 25(a)(l) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (dgr)--Please refer to to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- (Entered: 02/21/2024)
A Motion was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
23 hours, 36 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.