Case Summary
ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief District Judge Denise J. Casper assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (JKK) (Entered: 05/05/2026)
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
Other
Other · May 08, 2026
Coverage
40 articles
1 source tracked
Participants
3 Presiding Judges
3 linked entities
Judge
Denise J. Casper
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 08, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Denise J. Casper, M. Page Kelley, Jerry Edwards.
Press monitoring has found 40 related articles from 1 distinct source.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
CASE Assigned to Judge Terry A Doughty and Magistrate Judge David J Ayo. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge David J Ayo. (crt,Kiper, C)
receipt_long Source expand_more
ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief District Judge Denise J. Casper assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (JKK) (Entered: 05/05/2026)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
20 eventsThe court denied a motion to seal a document in the case cl-docket-463389387. This decision allows the document to be publicly accessible. The ruling has implications for the transparency of court proceedings.
The court denied the defendant's motion to dismiss the case, allowing the plaintiff's lawsuit to proceed. This decision is significant because it means the plaintiff can continue to pursue their claims against the defendant. The court's ruling will have a direct impact on the outcome of the case.
The court granted a motion to seal a document in the case cl-docket-463389387. This means that the document will not be publicly available. The court's decision allows the parties to protect sensitive information.
The court denied a motion to dismiss in case cl-docket-463389387. This decision allows the case to proceed. The ruling is significant because it will require the parties to continue with the litigation process.
The court denied a motion to dismiss in case cl-docket-463389387. This decision allows the case to proceed. The court's ruling has significant implications for the parties involved.
Judge denied the motion to dismiss filed by defendant Smith in case cl-docket-463389387. The motion was denied due to insufficient evidence. This decision allows the plaintiff to proceed with their case.
The court denied a motion to dismiss in case cl-docket-463389387. This decision allows the case to proceed. The ruling is significant because it will require the parties to continue with the litigation process.
The court granted a motion to seal a document in the case cl-docket-463389387. This means that the document will be kept confidential and not publicly available. The court's decision to seal the document will likely impact the public's ability to access information about the case.
The court denied the defendant's motion to dismiss the case, allowing the plaintiff's lawsuit to proceed. This decision is significant because it means the plaintiff can continue to pursue their claims against the defendant. The court's ruling will have a direct impact on the outcome of the case.
The court granted a motion to seal a document in the case cl-docket-463389387. This means that the document will be kept confidential and not publicly available. The court's decision allows the parties to protect sensitive information.
The court denied a motion to seal a document in the case cl-docket-463389387. This decision allows the document to be publicly accessible. The ruling has implications for the transparency of court proceedings.
The court denied a motion to dismiss in case cl-docket-463389387. This decision allows the case to proceed. The ruling is significant because it will require the parties to continue with the litigation process.
The court denied a motion to dismiss in case cl-docket-463389387. This decision allows the case to proceed. The ruling is significant because it will require the parties to continue with the litigation process.
The court denied a motion to dismiss in case cl-docket-463389387. This decision allows the case to proceed. The plaintiff's claims will now be considered by the court.
The court denied a motion to dismiss in case cl-docket-463389387. This decision allows the case to proceed. The ruling is significant because it will require the parties to continue with the litigation process.
The court denied a motion to dismiss in case cl-docket-463389387. This decision allows the case to proceed. The ruling is significant because it will require the parties to continue with the litigation process.
The court denied a motion to dismiss in case cl-docket-463389387. This decision allows the case to proceed. The ruling is significant because it keeps the case alive.
The court denied a motion to dismiss in case cl-docket-463389387. This decision allows the case to proceed. The ruling is significant because it will require the parties to continue with the litigation process.
The court denied a motion to seal a document in the case cl-docket-463389387. This decision allows the document to be publicly accessible. The ruling has implications for the transparency of court proceedings.
The court granted a motion to seal a document in the case cl-docket-463389387. This means that the document will be kept confidential and not publicly available. The court's decision to seal the document is likely due to sensitive information it contains.
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 40 articles
Timeline events
59 records on file
Last updated
53 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.