Case Summary
ORDER Before the Court is Petitioner's 13 Emergency Motion for Reconsideration. "The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not specifically provide for motions for reconsideration." Rivera v. Exeter Finance Corp., No. 15-cv-01057-PAB-MEH, 2019 WL 6173666, at *1 (D. Colo. Nov. 19, 2019) (citing Hatfield v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs for Converse Cnty., 52 F.3d 858, 861 (10th Cir. 1995)). The bases for granting reconsideration are extremely limited: " g rounds warranting a motion to reconsider include (1) an intervening change in the controlling law, (2) new evidence previously unavailable, and (3) the need to correct clear error or prevent manifest injustice. Thus, a motion for reconsideration is appropriate where the court has misapprehended the facts, a party's position, or the controlling law. It is not appropriate to revisit issues already addressed or advance arguments that could have been raised in prior briefing." Servants of the Paraclete v. Does, 204 F.3d 1005, 1012 (10th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted). These motions are committed to the trial court's discretion. See Phelps v.
Latest development
Verdict · May 7, 2026
A document was filed under seal.
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
Other
Other · May 07, 2026
Coverage
40 articles
1 source tracked
Participants
7 Government Agencys, 29 Presiding Judges, 10 Related Organizations
49 linked entities
Judge
S. Kato Crews
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 07, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes S. Kato Crews, Taryn A. Merkl, Joseph A. Marutollo and others.
Press monitoring has found 40 related articles from 1 distinct source.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT (Final Disclosure) (SEALED) as to Daniel Ryan Carrion. (available to USA, Daniel Ryan Carrion) RESTRICTED TO COUNSEL AND COURT (Attachments: # 1 Addendum)(pbh)
receipt_long Source expand_more
THIS PLEADING HAS BEEN STRICKEN PER ORDER OF THE COURT DATED 12/23/2025. Statement About Your Social Security Numbers Filed by Debtor Catera Shepard . (jmk). MODIFIED ON 12/23/2025 (admin). (Entered: 12/23/2025)
receipt_long Source expand_more
Order of the Court to Strike: This pleading is stricken from the record because debtor did not disclose full social security number. A corrected document is required to be filed, in its entirety, within 7 days of this order. If the corrected document(s) are not timely filed, the court may enter an order dismissing the case without a hearing (related documents Statement About Your Social Security Numbers). So Ordered by /s/ Judge Joel D. Applebaum.(RE: related document(s)4 Statement About Your So
receipt_long Source expand_more
Pro Se Filing Information Form has been submitted by PEDUP . (AGS) (Entered: 01/20/2026)
receipt_long Source expand_more
TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings as to Lee Bailey held on 1/8/2025, before Judge Justin Anand. Court Reporter/Transcriber Shannon R. Welch, RMR, CRR. A full directory of court reporters and their contact information can be found at www.gand.uscourts.gov/court-reporter-directory. Redaction Request due 2/19/2025. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 3/3/2025. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 4/29/2025. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Filing) (srw) (Entered: 01/29/2025)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
20 eventsA document was filed under seal.
The court granted a request to seal a document in the case cl-docket-463162952. This means that the document will not be publicly available. The sealing of the document is likely to prevent sensitive information from being disclosed.
The court granted a motion to seal a document in the case cl-docket-463162952. This means that the document will be kept confidential and not publicly available. The sealing of the document is likely to prevent sensitive information from being disclosed.
The court granted a motion to seal a document in the case cl-docket-463162952. This means that the document will be kept confidential and not publicly available. The sealing of the document is likely to prevent sensitive information from being disclosed.
The court granted a motion to seal a document in the case cl-docket-463162952. This means that the document will no longer be publicly available. The sealing of the document is likely due to sensitive or confidential information contained within.
The court granted a motion to seal a document in the case cl-docket-463162952. This means that the document will not be publicly available. The sealing of the document is likely due to sensitive or confidential information contained within.
The court granted a motion to seal a document in the case cl-docket-463162952. This means that the document will be kept confidential and not publicly available. The sealing of the document is likely to prevent sensitive information from being disclosed.
The court granted a motion to seal a document in the case cl-docket-463162952. This means that the document will be kept confidential and not publicly available. The sealing of the document is likely to prevent sensitive information from being disclosed.
The court granted a motion to seal a document in the case cl-docket-463162952. This means that the document will be kept confidential and not publicly available. The court's decision allows the parties to protect sensitive information.
The court granted a motion to seal a document in the case cl-docket-463162952. This means that the document will be kept confidential and not publicly available. The sealing of the document is likely due to sensitive information it contains.
The court granted a motion to seal a document in the case cl-docket-463162952. This means that the document will be kept confidential and not publicly available. The sealing of the document is likely to prevent sensitive information from being disclosed.
The court granted a motion to seal a document in the case cl-docket-463162952. This means that the document will be kept confidential and not publicly available. The sealing of the document is likely to prevent sensitive information from being disclosed.
The court granted a motion to seal a document in the case cl-docket-463162952. This means that the document will be kept confidential and not publicly available. The sealing of the document is likely to prevent sensitive information from being disclosed.
The court granted a motion to seal a document in the case cl-docket-463162952. This means that the document will be kept confidential and not publicly available. The sealing of the document is likely to prevent sensitive information from being disclosed.
Press Coverage
cl-docket-463261129
PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT (Final Disclosure) (SEALED) as to Daniel Ryan Carrion. (available to USA, Daniel Ryan Carrion) RESTRICTED TO COUNSEL AND COURT (Attachments: # 1 Addendum)(pbh)
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 40 articles
Timeline events
614 records on file
Last updated
20 hours, 39 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.