City Of Chicago et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al
Case Summary
The City of Chicago and other plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security and other defendants. The court issued an order on a motion to stay, but the details of the order are not specified.
Latest development
1:23-cv-02662 PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Order · April 27, 2026
A Motion to Stay was filed.
description View filingKey Issues
- • motion to stay
- • Department of Homeland Security
- • City of Chicago
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Order on Motion to Stay
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
3 events1:25-cv-02780 SMYTHE v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
A federal judge has allowed a lawsuit to proceed against the Department of Homeland Security and other defendants, including the City of Chicago, in a separate case. The lawsuit, 1:25-cv-02780 SMYTHE v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al, was filed in the Northern District of Illinois. This decision allows the plaintiff to continue pursuing their claims against the defendants.
1:25-cv-05463 City Of Chicago et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al
The City of Chicago and other plaintiffs have requested permission for an attorney to appear in the case against the Department of Homeland Security. The attorney, who is not licensed in the Northern District of Illinois, needs to be granted permission to participate in the case. This is a routine request that allows the attorney to continue working on the case.
1:23-cv-02662 PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
A Motion to Stay was filed.
Press Coverage
1:25-cv-05463 City Of Chicago et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al
Appear Pro Hac Vice ( 97
1:23-cv-02662 PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Order on Motion to Stay
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
1 hour, 4 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.