legal-news

Christopher Shane Rivera v. Macomber et al

25-cv-12058
Active Initial filing stage Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Christopher Shane Rivera v. Macomber et al is a civil case. The case involves a financial entry for an IFP filing fee. The plaintiff, Christopher Shane Rivera, is seeking relief from the defendant, Macomber et al.

Latest development

2:25-cv-12058 Christopher Shane Rivera v. Macomber et al

Filing · April 21, 2026

Christopher Shane Rivera filed a financial entry in his case against Macomber et al, requesting to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), which means he wants to continue with the lawsuit without paying the filing fee. This filing is a common step for individuals who cannot afford the costs associated with litigation. The court will review Rivera's financial information to determine whether he qualifies for IFP status.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • IFP filing fee
  • financial entry
  • civil rights
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
description
Filing April 21, 2026

2:25-cv-12058 Christopher Shane Rivera v. Macomber et al

Christopher Shane Rivera filed a financial entry in his case against Macomber et al, requesting to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), which means he wants to continue with the lawsuit without paying the filing fee. This filing is a common step for individuals who cannot afford the costs associated with litigation. The court will review Rivera's financial information to determine whether he qualifies for IFP status.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

19 hours, 23 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.