1:26-cv-02388 Baldwin v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Answer to Amended Complaint ( 12
2:26-cv-02388 Charles Rivkin v. Motion Pictures Editors Guild, IATSE LOCAL 700 et al
Latest development
Motion · May 5, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingCourt
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:26-cv-02388 Baldwin v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Other · May 08, 2026
Coverage
3 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
3 Defendants, 2 Plaintiffs, 1 Related Organization
7 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 08, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes ALPHA PLUS TECH, LLC, Motion Pictures Editors Guild, IATSE LOCAL 700, UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and others.
Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
Charles Rivkin v. Motion Pictures Editors Guild, IATSE LOCAL 700 et al is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 26-cv-02388.
The dispute currently identifies 2:26-cv-02388 Charles Rivkin and 5:26-cv-02388 HENAN BOOM GELATIN CO., LTD on one side and ALPHA PLUS TECH, LLC and Motion Pictures Editors Guild, IATSE LOCAL 700 on the other.
The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement, Claims pleaded in the complaint and early case posture.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Notice of Interested Parties was filed. On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a motion: A Motion was filed.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Amended Complaint/Petition ( 10
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The defendant filed their Answer to the Complaint.
A Notice of Interested Parties was filed.
A Motion was filed.
Answer to Amended Complaint ( 12
Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties ( 4
Amended Complaint/Petition ( 10
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
1 hour, 2 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.