Browse Cases

A report of the Rule 26(f) planning meeting was submitted. The parties conferred to plan discovery and scheduling under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f).

A uniform initial order was issued to set procedural guidelines for case management. This order typically outlines deadlines and discovery rules.

A motion for extension of time to file an answer was filed. The party seeks additional time beyond the original deadline to respond to the complaint.

A filing fee payment was submitted to the court. This fee is required to process the case and continue with judicial proceedings.

A summons request was filed to initiate formal notification of a defendant in a pending case. This step is necessary to begin the litigation process against the party.

The service of summons and complaint was returned executed within 21 days. This confirms the defendant was formally notified of the lawsuit within the required timeframe.

Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai waived defendant Shawn Wafford's appearance at the status conference scheduled for January 22, 2025, at counsel's request. The order reflects procedural accommodation in the criminal case.

Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai granted a joint motion to exclude seven days from the Speedy Trial Act timeline for Shawn Wafford. The exclusion, from September 23 to 30, 2025, allows counsel to complete investigation. The court found that the interests of justice outweigh the defendant’s and public’s right to a speedy

Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai rescheduled Shawn Wafford's sentencing from January 8, 2026, to March 18, 2026. The court allocated 30 minutes for the hearing unless parties request more time with advance notice. This order shows a procedural delay in final sentencing.

Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai reset the sentencing hearing for defendant Shawn Wafford from March 18, 2026, to May 13, 2026. The court set a 30-minute default time for sentencing unless notified otherwise two weeks in advance. This reflects routine scheduling adjustments in a criminal sentencing phase.

Magistrate Judge Amy E. Potter granted an unopposed motion extending the deadline to respond to a motion to suppress evidence. The new response deadline is January 26, 2026. This order reflects procedural scheduling in a criminal matter, likely involving pretrial motions.

A certificate of mailing by the Bankruptcy Noticing Center (BNC) confirms distribution of the Chapter 13 plan to creditors and parties in interest. This procedural step ensures notice compliance in the bankruptcy process and supports the plan's progression through the court system.

Northern District of Illinois

Wade and others filed an amended complaint against J.F. Labs Inc. in the Northern District of Illinois. The amendment introduces new claims or evidence, signaling an evolving litigation strategy.

Northern District of Illinois

In the Harris estate case, the Northern District of Illinois court allowed filing of additional documents. This procedural order permits submission of new evidence or information potentially impacting case outcomes.

Northern District of Illinois

The court granted miscellaneous relief in Lopez v. Cooper Air Freight Service in the Northern District of Illinois. The relief addressed procedural or substantive issues requiring court intervention but lacks specific detail.

Northern District of Illinois

Battles sued the City of Chicago Department of Finance in the Northern District of Illinois, alleging grievances or contractual issues. The case remains in early proceedings without detailed allegations disclosed.

Northern District of Illinois

Lapitan filed suit against ExxonMobil Oil Corporation in the Northern District of Illinois alleging corporate wrongdoing or contractual disputes. The case is in pre-trial stages, with high stakes due to the involvement of a major corporation.

Northern District of Illinois

Smith faces criminal charges related to the Federal Bureau of Prisons in the Northern District of Illinois. The case is set for trial, involving alleged criminal conduct within the prison system, though specific charges are not disclosed.

Northern District of Illinois

Satori Properties, LLC sued Frankenmuth Insurance Company in the Northern District of Illinois for breach of contract and insurance obligations. The case is in pre-trial briefing, focusing on alleged failures to meet contractual terms under an insurance policy.

Western District of Washington

The hearing in the criminal case USA v. Delacruz Aguirre was rescheduled in the Western District of Washington. This procedural change affects the timeline but does not alter the substantive charges or case posture.