Browse Cases

District of Massachusetts

Berkley Specialty Insurance Company responded to counterclaims filed by 26 Miller Road LLC and others in a Massachusetts civil case. The 15-page response outlines Berkley's defenses and challenges to the counterclaims. This filing advances the dispute and frames issues for potential motion practice or trial.

Central District of California

Joseph Spedaliere filed a civil lawsuit against Subaru of America in the Central District of California, seeking $35,000 in attorney fees. The case centers on determining the appropriate allocation and payment of these fees. The dispute likely involves contractual or statutory fee-shifting provisions.

District of Massachusetts

The District of Massachusetts court rescheduled a hearing in the criminal case of Oliveria v. United States. The procedural adjustment affects the court's calendar and parties' preparation timelines. Rescheduling may result from logistical issues or strategic considerations by either party or the court.

District of Massachusetts

Rubin filed an amended complaint against Staples, Inc. in the District of Massachusetts, signaling ongoing litigation with revised claims. The amendment may reflect new facts, legal theories, or corrections to the original complaint. This step often extends the litigation timeline and refines the issues for trial or

District of Massachusetts

Plaintiff German Perez voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit against Texis Restaurants, Inc. in the District of Massachusetts under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). This dismissal was filed without a court order, indicating the plaintiff chose to end the litigation, likely without prejudice. The dismissal closes

Central District of California

The Central District of California identified a duplicate criminal case against Nammas, mirroring case 4558. The filings, including the government's notice of attorney appearance, are nearly identical, suggesting administrative overlap or consolidation needs. The court must address the duplication to avoid redundant

District of New Jersey

The District of New Jersey court is handling a procedural dispute in the matter of William Ulysses McClamary, II. The dispute involves an objection to a motion filed by one party, which challenges a procedural step proposed by the opposing side. This objection could influence the case's procedural path and potentially

No details are provided for the case concerning the 'Personal Financial Management Course.' The docket and court information are missing.

No substantive information exists for the case titled 'Certificate of Debtor Education.' The court and docket information are unknown.

No information is available regarding the 'Chapter 13 Plan' case. The docket and court details are unspecified, and no summary is provided.

The Initial Case Management Conference was held via Zoom on June 4, 2025, before Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. The court will issue a Pretrial Order confirming discussed dates. A Further Case Management Conference is scheduled for September 3, 2025, with an updated statement due August 28, 2025.

The court continued the Case Management Conference from September 3 to November 5, 2025, at 2:00 p.m. before Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. The hearing will be conducted via Zoom webinar, with advance notice required for appearances or arguments.

Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granted a stipulation to amend the schedule on October 15, 2025. The amended schedule set joint letter briefs on the administrative record and conflict of interest discovery for November 3, 2025, with all other deadlines unchanged.

Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley continued the case management conference from November 5 to November 12, 2025, at 2:00 p.m. via Zoom. The continuance followed a new deadline for discovery dispute joint letters related to the administrative record and conflicts of interest.

The case was formally referred to mediation as of November 10, 2025. This referral indicates the court’s push toward alternative dispute resolution to help settlement.

A mediation hearing was scheduled for February 26, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. via Zoom. This scheduling was filed on January 30, 2026, reflecting the court’s continued use of remote proceedings for mediation.

The court was informed that the case settled. The Further Case Management Conference originally set for March 4, 2026, was continued to April 15, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. via Zoom to allow time for parties to finalize the settlement.

Mediator C. Mark Humbert certified that the parties held a mediation session on February 26, 2026, which resulted in settlement. The mediation process is complete as of the filing date March 3, 2026.

Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granted a request to extend the deadline for filing a stipulation of dismissal to June 1, 2026. This order was entered as a text-only entry without an associated document.

The court advanced the Case Management Conference to May 6, 2026, at 1:00 p.m. The hearing will be conducted via Zoom webinar, accessible to counsel, the public, and media. Counsel or parties wishing to appear or argue must provide advance notice with a list of names to the court.