Browse Cases

Southern District of New York

The court issued a report and recommendations in Svatovic v. James, a civil case in the Southern District of New York, docket 25-cv-07005. The report likely addresses dispositive or procedural motions, guiding the court's forthcoming decisions.

Southern District of New York

Srour filed a civil lawsuit against New York City and other defendants in the Southern District of New York under docket 22-cv-00003. The case is in its early stages or lacks publicly available information, with no clear details on the claims or status.

District of Massachusetts

This entry duplicates case 3531, involving Greenspan v. MasMarques et al, and similarly concerns a court order on a motion for extension of time. The procedural posture indicates ongoing case management activity. No additional substantive information is available beyond the procedural ruling on the extension request.

Central District of California

This case involves plaintiff Zareh Manjikian against defendant Sean Moore and others. The docket reflects a recent procedural development granting an extension of time to file certain documents or responses. Specific substantive claims or legal issues are not detailed in the available information. The extension

Central District of California

MY GAMEROOM, LLC filed a lawsuit against Hasbro, Inc. and others under docket number 25-cv-07392. The case currently shows a procedural issue with mail being returned, indicating possible difficulties in communication or service of process.

District of Massachusetts

Another entry for Taylor v. Grunigen, docket 19-cv-11947, noting an order without further details. The case remains active with limited public information on substantive matters or procedural progress.

Central District of California

Domingo Cruz Garcia, Jr. III v. City of Hemet et al is a civil case involving claims against a municipal entity. The docket entry is a text-only scheduling notice, indicating updates to the court calendar or deadlines.

Central District of California

Cristian Bureriu v. Conejo Valley Unified School District appears to be a dispute involving an individual and a school district. The docket entry referencing utility flags suggests internal case management activity rather than substantive rulings or motions.

District of Massachusetts

Another duplicate entry for McMillin et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation reflecting the notice of case assignment. No new substantive information is available to further clarify the case issues or status.

District of Massachusetts

The case Costas Provisions Corp. v. Coyote Logistics LLC et al involves a dispute between a provisions company and a logistics firm. The current docket entry is an order, but no further details about the nature of the order or the underlying claims are provided.

District of Massachusetts

This entry duplicates the case Luckenson v. Moniz with docket 26-cv-11505. The only available information is that a copy of a document was mailed. No details about the claims, parties' arguments, or case status are provided. Further case development is needed to provide meaningful analysis or risk assessment.

District of Massachusetts

In Securities and Exchange Commission v. Morocoin Tech Corp. et al, the SEC alleges securities law violations by Morocoin Tech Corp. and associated parties. The case involves regulatory enforcement actions aimed at addressing potential misconduct in the issuance or trading of securities related to the defendants. The

Southern District of New York

Tagliarino v. Falcon Safety Products, Inc. et al, docket 24-cv-06060 in the Southern District of New York, is a civil case. A recent telephone conference likely addressed case management or discovery issues, showing active court and party engagement.

Southern District of New York

Baker v. MTA Bus Company et al, docket 18-cv-12231 in the Southern District of New York, is a civil case involving a plaintiff against the MTA Bus Company and others. A scheduling order was issued, setting deadlines for discovery and motions in the pretrial phase.

Southern District of New York

Hicks v. Hazel et al, docket 25-cv-02178 in the Southern District of New York, involves a motion for miscellaneous relief. The motion likely addresses procedural or administrative issues such as scheduling or discovery disputes.

Southern District of New York

Private Jet Services Group, LLC v. County of Westchester, New York et al, docket 25-cv-04820 in the Southern District of New York, was voluntarily dismissed by stipulation of the parties. The dismissal likely resolves the dispute without trial.

Southern District of New York

McNulty v. EZE Castle Integration, Inc., docket 24-cv-09983 in the Southern District of New York, involves a motion to adjourn a scheduled conference. This procedural request indicates ongoing case management and preparation.

Southern District of New York

Waheed et al v. Rentoulis et al, docket 24-cv-06476 in the Southern District of New York, is a civil case with limited public details. The presence of multiple plaintiffs and defendants suggests potential complexity in factual or legal issues.

Southern District of New York

Melendez et al v. United States of America, docket 25-cv-08155 in the Southern District of New York, is a civil case involving claims against the federal government. Counsel has formally entered the case, signaling preparation for substantive proceedings.

Southern District of New York

Oleman v. Hammer et al, docket 23-cv-03607 in the Southern District of New York, is a civil case currently in early litigation. A recent case management conference addressed procedural coordination and set a framework for case progression.