Browse Cases

Southern District of New York

The court granted an extension in Area Metaverse Real Estate Inc. v. Neon Machine, Inc. et al, a civil litigation matter in the Southern District of New York, docket 25-cv-10057. The case likely involves business or contractual disputes given the corporate parties.

Southern District of New York

Noble Security, Inc. and others sued Acco Brands Corporation in a civil case under docket 16-cv-09129 in the Southern District of New York. The case appears dormant or lacks recent public updates.

Southern District of New York

Schofield requested issuance of an amended summons in a civil suit against World Wrestling Entertainment Inc. in the Southern District of New York, docket 25-cv-10038. This procedural move likely adjusts parties or claims involved in the case.

Southern District of New York

Kate Spade LLC and others were granted an extension to respond in their civil suit against Vinci Brands LLC in the Southern District of New York, docket 23-cv-05409. The extension reflects ongoing procedural developments in the litigation.

Southern District of New York

In Noel v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al, docket 24-cv-06858, the court addressed a motion for an attorney to withdraw in this civil case in the Southern District of New York. This indicates a change in legal representation for a party.

Southern District of New York

Bragg filed a notice of appeal in a civil dispute with Triangle Services, Inc. in the Southern District of New York, docket 24-cv-07725. This procedural step challenges a lower court decision and moves the case into appellate review.

Southern District of New York

Lewis filed a civil suit against Jackman and others in the Southern District of New York under docket 25-cv-08792. The case details remain unspecified, indicating an early procedural stage or limited public information.

Southern District of New York

Vinci Brands LLC received an extension to respond in a trademark-related civil suit against Coach Services, Inc. in the Southern District of New York, docket 23-cv-05138. The extension suggests ongoing negotiations or complexity in the commercial dispute.

Southern District of New York

The court issued a report and recommendations in Svatovic v. James, a civil case in the Southern District of New York, docket 25-cv-07005. The report likely addresses dispositive or procedural motions, guiding the court's forthcoming decisions.

Southern District of New York

Srour filed a civil lawsuit against New York City and other defendants in the Southern District of New York under docket 22-cv-00003. The case is in its early stages or lacks publicly available information, with no clear details on the claims or status.

District of Massachusetts

This entry duplicates case 3531, involving Greenspan v. MasMarques et al, and similarly concerns a court order on a motion for extension of time. The procedural posture indicates ongoing case management activity. No additional substantive information is available beyond the procedural ruling on the extension request.

Central District of California

This case involves plaintiff Zareh Manjikian against defendant Sean Moore and others. The docket reflects a recent procedural development granting an extension of time to file certain documents or responses. Specific substantive claims or legal issues are not detailed in the available information. The extension

Central District of California

MY GAMEROOM, LLC filed a lawsuit against Hasbro, Inc. and others under docket number 25-cv-07392. The case currently shows a procedural issue with mail being returned, indicating possible difficulties in communication or service of process.

District of Massachusetts

Another entry for Taylor v. Grunigen, docket 19-cv-11947, noting an order without further details. The case remains active with limited public information on substantive matters or procedural progress.

Central District of California

Domingo Cruz Garcia, Jr. III v. City of Hemet et al is a civil case involving claims against a municipal entity. The docket entry is a text-only scheduling notice, indicating updates to the court calendar or deadlines.

Central District of California

Cristian Bureriu v. Conejo Valley Unified School District appears to be a dispute involving an individual and a school district. The docket entry referencing utility flags suggests internal case management activity rather than substantive rulings or motions.

District of Massachusetts

Another duplicate entry for McMillin et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation reflecting the notice of case assignment. No new substantive information is available to further clarify the case issues or status.

District of Massachusetts

The case Costas Provisions Corp. v. Coyote Logistics LLC et al involves a dispute between a provisions company and a logistics firm. The current docket entry is an order, but no further details about the nature of the order or the underlying claims are provided.

District of Massachusetts

This entry duplicates the case Luckenson v. Moniz with docket 26-cv-11505. The only available information is that a copy of a document was mailed. No details about the claims, parties' arguments, or case status are provided. Further case development is needed to provide meaningful analysis or risk assessment.

District of Massachusetts

In Securities and Exchange Commission v. Morocoin Tech Corp. et al, the SEC alleges securities law violations by Morocoin Tech Corp. and associated parties. The case involves regulatory enforcement actions aimed at addressing potential misconduct in the issuance or trading of securities related to the defendants. The