Browse Cases

Central District of California

A preliminary revocation hearing occurred in USA v. Messersmith in the Central District of California, docket 19-cr-00347. The hearing addressed alleged violations of release or probation conditions and whether detention is warranted pending further proceedings.

Central District of California

Emerging Acquisitions LLC filed a declaration in its case against Leslie Wells and others in the Central District of California, docket 23-cv-00329. The declaration supports motions or factual assertions during civil litigation. The case is actively progressing through evidentiary phases.

Central District of California

The Central District of California entered default against Monster Straw Co. in Monster Energy Co. v. Monster Straw Co., docket 25-cv-02622. Default entry followed the defendant's failure to respond or appear. The case likely involves trademark infringement or unfair competition claims.

District of Colorado

Seay Propst filed a motion to reopen a case against Moore and others in the District of Colorado, docket 26-cv-21339. The prior case was closed or dismissed. The motion indicates intent to revive the dispute, though details on the underlying claims are absent.

Southern District of Florida

Rashtchy v. Columbia Debt Recovery LLC opened in the Southern District of Florida, docket 26-cv-61098. Public filings lack substantive information, but the defendant's name suggests a debt collection dispute. The case is in early stages with minimal public activity.

Southern District of Florida

The Southern District of Florida issued an order on a motion to remand in Campbell v. Spavia International, docket 26-cv-60998. The order addresses whether the case should return to state court, a procedural dispute affecting jurisdiction.

District of Colorado

Federal criminal charges were filed against Malvasio in the District of Colorado under docket 23-cr-00396. The case includes sealed documents, limiting public information on the charges or procedural posture.

Central District of California

Zurich American Insurance Company filed suit against Legacy Tower MWC, LLC and others in the Central District of California, docket 26-cv-21648. A notice of attorney appearance confirms active legal representation. The complaint details and claims remain undisclosed at this time.

District of Columbia

Zepeda v. Willingboro Board of Education, docket 26-cv-00534 in the District of Columbia, has reached the status conference stage. This early procedural phase involves discussions on scheduling, discovery, and case management. The case likely involves civil claims related to education or employment given the defendant

District of Massachusetts

Chowdhury has filed a civil lawsuit against Ammons and others. The case is currently in a phase where an opposition to a motion has been submitted, reflecting contested procedural or substantive issues. The specific motion opposed has not been detailed. This activity indicates active litigation with parties engaging

District of Massachusetts

HC&D, LLC has initiated a civil lawsuit against Cashman Equipment Corp. and others. The case has reached a stage where a trial brief has been filed, indicating preparation for trial and the crystallization of legal arguments and evidence. This procedural posture suggests that discovery and pretrial motions have likely

District of Massachusetts

In Serra v. Town of East Longmeadow et al, the plaintiff initiated a civil lawsuit against the Town of East Longmeadow and other defendants. The case is in its early stages, with a summons having been issued to notify the defendants of the legal action. Specific allegations and claims have not been detailed in the

District of Massachusetts

Simpson v. NASA is a civil case assigned to a magistrate judge, as indicated by the docket entry. The assignment to a magistrate judge typically facilitates case management, discovery supervision, or resolution of pretrial matters. The case involves a federal agency defendant, NASA, suggesting potential claims related

District of Massachusetts

Adams et al v. Mass General Brigham Incorporated is a civil case involving multiple plaintiffs against a healthcare entity. The docket entry notes the filing of an official transcript, likely from a prior hearing or deposition, which will be used as part of the case record. This procedural update supports the

Central District of California

Shanghai Asian Development International Transportation Pu Dong Co., Ltd. is the plaintiff against ADP Global Logistics Inc. USA and others. The latest docket entry involves an appearance pro hac vice, indicating that an attorney not admitted to the court has been granted permission to participate in this case.

District of Massachusetts

Walsh has filed suit against Transamerica Life Insurance Company. The latest docket entry is an order granting a motion for an extension of time to answer, indicating that the defendant has been allowed additional time to respond to the complaint.

Central District of California

Edwin Bazarganfard and others have brought a case against Club 360 LLC and additional defendants. The most recent docket entry is minutes from an in chambers order or directive, with no proceeding held. This suggests the court issued a ruling or instruction without a formal hearing.

District of Massachusetts

In this case, Kim is the plaintiff against Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences and others. The latest filing is an opposition to a motion, indicating active litigation and contested procedural or substantive issues. The opposition suggests the plaintiff is challenging a request made by the defendants

District of Massachusetts

Chelmsford Water District, Massachusetts, has initiated a lawsuit against Electrometals, Inc. and others. The docket entry references an order on a motion for leave to appear, indicating a procedural ruling allowing a party or counsel to participate in the case. This procedural development suggests active litigation

District of Massachusetts

ZipBy USA LLC and others are involved in litigation against Parzych. The docket notes a USCA mandate, indicating an appellate court has issued a directive following an appeal. This suggests prior proceedings in lower courts with appellate review completed. The issuance of the mandate typically signals the conclusion