newspaper
legal-news
Seay Propst et al v. Moore et al
26-cv-21339
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
Seay Propst and others have filed to reopen a case against Moore and others. The docket entry notes a motion or order to reopen, indicating prior closure or dismissal. Specifics regarding the underlying dispute or reasons for reopening are not provided.
Latest development
1:25-cv-00222 Trevino v. Moree et al
Order · April 15, 2026
The court issued an order regarding a motion for reconsideration in the case Trevino v. Moree. This means the court reviewed a previous decision and decided whether to change it based on new arguments or evidence. Such orders are important because they can alter the course of the case by addressing potential errors or overlooked information.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Motion to reopen case
- • Parties: Seay Propst et al v. Moore et al
- • Previously closed or dismissed case
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
update What Changed This Week
1 event
gavel
Order
3 days ago
The court issued an order regarding a motion for reconsideration in the case Trevino v. Moree. This means the court reviewed a previous decision and decided whether to change it based on new arguments or evidence. Such orders are important
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Order on Motion for Reconsideration ( 30
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
4 events
gavel
Order
April 15, 2026
1:25-cv-00222 Trevino v. Moree et al
The court issued an order regarding a motion for reconsideration in the case Trevino v. Moree. This means the court reviewed a previous decision and decided whether to change it based on new arguments or evidence. Such orders are important because they can alter the course of the case by addressing potential errors or overlooked information.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
9:26-cr-80052-1 USA v. Moore, et. al.
In the case Seay Propst et al v. Moore et al, a related criminal case titled USA v. Moore et al was referenced or noted. This indicates there may be overlapping issues or parties involved between the civil and criminal proceedings. Understanding the connection between these cases can provide insight into the broader legal context and potential implications for the defendants.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
9:26-cr-80052-2 USA v. Moore, et. al.
In the case Seay Propst et al v. Moore et al, a related criminal case titled USA v. Moore et al was referenced or noted. This indicates that the civil case may be connected to ongoing criminal proceedings involving the same parties. Understanding this connection is important as developments in the criminal case could impact the civil litigation.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:26-cv-21339 Seay Propst et al v. Moore et al
The court decided to reopen the case Seay Propst et al v. Moore et al, which means the legal proceedings will continue after previously being closed. This allows the parties involved to present new evidence or arguments. Reopening a case can significantly impact the outcome by giving the court another chance to review the matter.
Advertisement
newspaper
4 articles
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 4 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 18 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.